D
Deleted member 545701
Guest
Lots of fighters improve over the years and people throw specific losses away because they believe "if they fought today, fighter X would easily win".
I think there has been two very stand out examples of this lately.
#1 - Al Iaquinta vs Kevin Lee II
The first fight was Kevin Lee's UFC debut. He was a lot skinnier back then and was very green. The first fight was pretty close actually.
This is the scorecard. So the whole mindset was, Kevin Lee won a round against Al on his debut. Now that he fought for a world title and dominated Edson Barboza, this would be much different. He really battered Barboza, maybe worse than Khabib did.
Then it came, this was going to be Kevin Lee's revenge. He was going to send Al back to the prelims and beat Al worse than Khabib did.
But, it turns out Al Iaquinta is just a bad match up for Kevin Lee. He has good wrestling, decent boxing, and 5 round cardio. I don't really consider Al a top 5 lightweight, but Kevin Lee just couldn't beat him.
#2 - Dustin Poirier vs Max Holloway II
This one was a lot different. I personally thought that this fight could go either way. Somedays I thought Poirier would destroy Max, and other days I thought Max would get the win. Either way, a majority of the MMA fanbase believed Max had improved far too much for Poirier to beat him. He was on a 13 fight win streak and he was the featherweight champion of the world. Meanwhile Poirier had scraped together a solid streak of tough opponents, but he had the journey man vibe.
This was the young Max. It was the same reasoning that people believed Holloway would melt Conor in a rematch. This was an even greener Max than the one Conor fought. This was his UFC debut.
Max would avenge one of his losses at FW and then challenge Khabib for the title. It was all in the plan, but the result stayed the same
Dustin won 4 rounds against Holloway, proving to be Max's toughest match up so far.
What are some other examples of rematches that fans truly believed would be different?
I think there has been two very stand out examples of this lately.
#1 - Al Iaquinta vs Kevin Lee II
The first fight was Kevin Lee's UFC debut. He was a lot skinnier back then and was very green. The first fight was pretty close actually.
This is the scorecard. So the whole mindset was, Kevin Lee won a round against Al on his debut. Now that he fought for a world title and dominated Edson Barboza, this would be much different. He really battered Barboza, maybe worse than Khabib did.
Then it came, this was going to be Kevin Lee's revenge. He was going to send Al back to the prelims and beat Al worse than Khabib did.
But, it turns out Al Iaquinta is just a bad match up for Kevin Lee. He has good wrestling, decent boxing, and 5 round cardio. I don't really consider Al a top 5 lightweight, but Kevin Lee just couldn't beat him.
#2 - Dustin Poirier vs Max Holloway II
This one was a lot different. I personally thought that this fight could go either way. Somedays I thought Poirier would destroy Max, and other days I thought Max would get the win. Either way, a majority of the MMA fanbase believed Max had improved far too much for Poirier to beat him. He was on a 13 fight win streak and he was the featherweight champion of the world. Meanwhile Poirier had scraped together a solid streak of tough opponents, but he had the journey man vibe.
This was the young Max. It was the same reasoning that people believed Holloway would melt Conor in a rematch. This was an even greener Max than the one Conor fought. This was his UFC debut.
Max would avenge one of his losses at FW and then challenge Khabib for the title. It was all in the plan, but the result stayed the same
Dustin won 4 rounds against Holloway, proving to be Max's toughest match up so far.
What are some other examples of rematches that fans truly believed would be different?