- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 78,602
- Reaction score
- 17,022
Thank you Anung Un Rama for dealing with that for me, lol.
Was like, dude, you dont already have a harddrive?!
Thats probably what a pancreas will look like in 100 years, too.
Thank you Anung Un Rama for dealing with that for me, lol.
Was like, dude, you dont already have a harddrive?!
I wonder how responsible it is to go after a technology like this? When I think of no death I think of massive overpopulation. How could we counter the massive boom from an extra 40 years on the lifespan?
That's not really how memory formation works.
The global population is expected to stabilize in the next few decades and according to the low estimates, even start declining.
Aging population issues have to do with large, non-working unhealthy elderly. If an increase in lifespan comes with a commensurate increase in productive years, then a temporarily inverted population pyramid isn't that big of a deal.
Likewise, on a global scale, population growth and stability is really just a migration and economic equality issue.
Would love to see some links on this if you get a chance, My last reading on this subject said otherwise....
Even though we're really crowded around cities, I don't think we use up that much of the planet.
http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/global-population-10-billion-not-so-fast
Most parties agree that we will stabilize at 10 billion.
The issue with overpopulation is under-developed countries.
Industrialization = condoms and pill = smaller families
This is demonstrated over and over.
Once Africa and India get totally industrialized (give it 100 years), the growth problem is all but solved.
only in Europe, NA, and Australia is this true.
Everyone except the white man is prolifically breeding at break neck self destructive pace.
I just don't want to outlive my kids.
Just ask Connor MacLeod from highlander.