Johny Hendricks vs GSP Decision

La Elefante

Green Belt
Joined
Apr 25, 2017
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
349
Has this decision ever been investigated for foul play? That was a clear win for Johny, unquestionably the wrong decision.

There have been some razor close decisions where there is legitimate debate about who the real winner was (Diaz v Condit, Jones v Gus), but this decision seemed like a work. It appears the Judges were given the instructions that if the fight is even remotely competitive to give the nod to GSP. I'm not one to complain about a close decision that coulda gone either way, but that fight was a clear victory for Johny, not even a doubt

b3fgUFR.png
 
its been discussed a lot use search function
 
GSP 1,3,5. When you sing and dance in the fifth and don't even try to win, you aren't deserving of being a champion anyway.

Georges retired a champ and left the UFC because they refused to back him against pre USADA Hendricks, who conveniently looked like dogshit as soon as USADA came into the picture.
 
Why it Condit vs Diaz listed, Carlos clearly won. Machida/Shogun 1 was more baffling
 
The decision was complete bullshit.
 
I thought Hendricks won, but it was a very close fight and its scored round by round. Pretty much everyone which includes the judges scored rounds 2 and 4 for Hendricks and 3 and 5 for GSP. It all comes down to R1 and two judges went GSP. I've watched the fight several times and R1 is a very close round. That fight could have gone either way. Even if Hendricks got the decision, I don't think it would have meant that Hendricks was the better fighter. GSP held the title for a long time and had suffered two serious knee injuries and a badly torn hamstring. He was not the same fighter after those injuries. Hendricks is no longer the same fighter either. MMA fighters have peaks and valleys due to injuries, age, weight cut, personal lives, etc. GSP held the WW title a long time and Hendricks was a very short-term title holder. Anderson Silva and BJ Penn were two of the best in that same era and now one of them is ordinary and the other shockingly bad.

I have to agree with the poster above who said that Machida vs. Shogun 1 was more baffling. Condit vs. Lawler more baffling. And Condit clearly beat Diaz. Sticking and moving and getting the better of the exchanges is a well known strategy.
 
Has this decision ever been investigated for foul play? That was a clear win for Johny, unquestionably the wrong decision.

There have been some razor close decisions where there is legitimate debate about who the real winner was (Diaz v Condit, Jones v Gus), but this decision seemed like a work. It appears the Judges were given the instructions that if the fight is even remotely competitive to give the nod to GSP. I'm not one to complain about a close decision that coulda gone either way, but that fight was a clear victory for Johny, not even a doubt

b3fgUFR.png

Did you just now see this fight for the first time?
 
but u godda deduct a point per round for johnny cuz it was pre usada hendrix who was obviously juiced... so GSP by a clean decision win, no controversy at all
 
Has this decision ever been investigated for foul play? That was a clear win for Johny, unquestionably the wrong decision.

There have been some razor close decisions where there is legitimate debate about who the real winner was (Diaz v Condit, Jones v Gus), but this decision seemed like a work. It appears the Judges were given the instructions that if the fight is even remotely competitive to give the nod to GSP. I'm not one to complain about a close decision that coulda gone either way, but that fight was a clear victory for Johny, not even a doubt

b3fgUFR.png
It's too early to trolling out of boredom. Also, johny not tapped in rd.1

Ps. How many years ago was this fight? 4?
 
Has this decision ever been investigated for foul play? That was a clear win for Johny, unquestionably the wrong decision.

There have been some razor close decisions where there is legitimate debate about who the real winner was (Diaz v Condit, Jones v Gus), but this decision seemed like a work. It appears the Judges were given the instructions that if the fight is even remotely competitive to give the nod to GSP. I'm not one to complain about a close decision that coulda gone either way, but that fight was a clear victory for Johny, not even a doubt

b3fgUFR.png
I believe, now correct me if I'm wrong here, but the top 3 names COUNT and the other names circled in red are just wishful thinking and DON'T COUNT?

I'm waiting for the score card from the MANDELA EFFECT, that show Hendricks actually won....lololol
 
GSP lost the fight and then retired weeks before enhanced testing started. This is factual
 
GSP lost the fight and then retired weeks before enhanced testing started. This is factual
Except it is wrong. GSP won the fight and the record factually shows that.

Also GSP submitted to enhanced testing VOLUNTARILY for that fight and Johnny said he would and then did not and since testing has come in Johnny has been a shell of his former self.
 
GSP 1,3,5. When you sing and dance in the fifth and don't even try to win, you aren't deserving of being a champion anyway.

Georges retired a champ and left the UFC because they refused to back him against pre USADA Hendricks, who conveniently looked like dogshit as soon as USADA came into the picture.

Gsp left because he got the brakes beaten off his alien head.
Since usada, Hendricks got a belt. Gsp stayed shook until bisping gave him an easy in that he wouldn't need steroids for.
 
Try The Pegasus Research Consortium, we have a nice thread over there on the Mandela Effect, which clearly some of you are living in an alternate time line....lololol
 
Back
Top