- Joined
- Sep 5, 2012
- Messages
- 12,045
- Reaction score
- 6,351
In this video, there are front snap kick, teep, and hybrid front snap - teeps knocking people out or knocking the wind out of them:
While it is true about any knockout reel, people tend not to react to the front kick until it is too late. I personally believe that the primary reason people are shy about throwing the front snap kick is the fear of hitting an elbow with the top of the foot, and the difficulty of landing it flush (it isn't the easiest kick to hit with). When in a position where kicking the elbow isn't likely, most front snap kicks go unanswered.
The front snap kick is different than the teep. The FSK is a chambered kick that swings up and sticks the ball of the foot into the opponents gut or chin without pushing them back. The goal is to make an instant deformity and rechamber without pushing.
I love the front snap kick and have had success knocking the wind out of people in sparring with it. Now it is becoming more popular as a sudden kick to the teeth. Unfortunately, I don't think there is a whole lot known about using it, defending it or setting it up, especially with a typical MT or MMA guard. Right now it is mostly a surprise move and is working because people don't react to the chamber because they believe it is going to be a teep which they would handle differently.
For reference, here is the front snap kick:
Most of the front kick defenses online suppose that the opponent is going to throw a slow teep, or kick and leave it hanging out there. The first video is better than the others and more of a teep, but he is teaching WAY too much movement for a fast snap kick. I'm mostly posting it because he brings up the problem of defending a chambered kick, in that a good kicker will aim it wherever the hole is. Block low, get hit high.
That gives context to the second video and why I don't like it. The already low guard makes a slow kick to the gut less likely, and the block shown from any position begs for the kick to go towards the face. Starting the block late enough to prevent the kick from choosing the face is going to make the block too slow to work (this is a worst case scenario against a good kicker, rather than an obvious kick from a slow beginner).
The final video of the next three is an example of the most typical and worst front kick defenses shown on the internet, and I've been taught these from more than one TMA in more than one city. I believe they are unfortunately very common: too slow and suppose you will be so much faster than your opponent.
Defending the front snap kick, conventionally in kick boxing, is done with a parry like this:
Here you can see Master K teaching the same motion:
This basic defense, and I have no historical reference for this, I believe was correct for the slower push kick or teep but is wrong for the front snap kick, which can more easily change angles. In addition, the front snap kick is almost as fast as a jab, and dropping the hand into the parrying position takes a long time. It isn't possible unless you are doing a good job of reading the kick, which is why parrying the front kick - even the attempt to do it - is barely present in the knock out compilation.
So to make my point clearer, because I know I'm not the best writer:
I believe that front kicks aren't used much in mma because it is difficult for people to know how to set them up to avoid the easy elbow spike.
The elbow spike is more of an accident of having a high guard, but isn't a reliable defense. When an opponent feels confident that they can throw the kick, the most common defense is flinching. People don't know what to do to defend it, because the common defenses are more appropriate for the teep or TKD push kick, but not for the snap kick.
Next post: using and defending the front snap kick well.
While it is true about any knockout reel, people tend not to react to the front kick until it is too late. I personally believe that the primary reason people are shy about throwing the front snap kick is the fear of hitting an elbow with the top of the foot, and the difficulty of landing it flush (it isn't the easiest kick to hit with). When in a position where kicking the elbow isn't likely, most front snap kicks go unanswered.
The front snap kick is different than the teep. The FSK is a chambered kick that swings up and sticks the ball of the foot into the opponents gut or chin without pushing them back. The goal is to make an instant deformity and rechamber without pushing.
I love the front snap kick and have had success knocking the wind out of people in sparring with it. Now it is becoming more popular as a sudden kick to the teeth. Unfortunately, I don't think there is a whole lot known about using it, defending it or setting it up, especially with a typical MT or MMA guard. Right now it is mostly a surprise move and is working because people don't react to the chamber because they believe it is going to be a teep which they would handle differently.
For reference, here is the front snap kick:
Most of the front kick defenses online suppose that the opponent is going to throw a slow teep, or kick and leave it hanging out there. The first video is better than the others and more of a teep, but he is teaching WAY too much movement for a fast snap kick. I'm mostly posting it because he brings up the problem of defending a chambered kick, in that a good kicker will aim it wherever the hole is. Block low, get hit high.
That gives context to the second video and why I don't like it. The already low guard makes a slow kick to the gut less likely, and the block shown from any position begs for the kick to go towards the face. Starting the block late enough to prevent the kick from choosing the face is going to make the block too slow to work (this is a worst case scenario against a good kicker, rather than an obvious kick from a slow beginner).
The final video of the next three is an example of the most typical and worst front kick defenses shown on the internet, and I've been taught these from more than one TMA in more than one city. I believe they are unfortunately very common: too slow and suppose you will be so much faster than your opponent.
Defending the front snap kick, conventionally in kick boxing, is done with a parry like this:
Here you can see Master K teaching the same motion:
This basic defense, and I have no historical reference for this, I believe was correct for the slower push kick or teep but is wrong for the front snap kick, which can more easily change angles. In addition, the front snap kick is almost as fast as a jab, and dropping the hand into the parrying position takes a long time. It isn't possible unless you are doing a good job of reading the kick, which is why parrying the front kick - even the attempt to do it - is barely present in the knock out compilation.
So to make my point clearer, because I know I'm not the best writer:
I believe that front kicks aren't used much in mma because it is difficult for people to know how to set them up to avoid the easy elbow spike.
The elbow spike is more of an accident of having a high guard, but isn't a reliable defense. When an opponent feels confident that they can throw the kick, the most common defense is flinching. People don't know what to do to defend it, because the common defenses are more appropriate for the teep or TKD push kick, but not for the snap kick.
Next post: using and defending the front snap kick well.