Guccifer 2.0 Allegdely Hacked The Clinton Foundation

[TheStruggle]

On Tuesday the hacker known as Guccifer 2.0 released another round of leaked documents. The document dump contains hundreds of thousands of documents and donor databases from the Bill and Hillary Clinton Foundation.



From the Guccifer 2.0 website:

"Many of you have been waiting for this, some even asked me to do it.

So, this is the moment. I hacked the Clinton Foundation server and downloaded hundreds of thousands of docs and donors’ databases.

Hillary Clinton and her staff don’t even bother about the information security. It was just a matter of time to gain access to the Clinton Foundation server.

Here’s the contents of one of the folders that I got from there"





https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/clinton-foundation/

https://ufile.io/ebd





If the hack is legit, there are concerns about TARP funds being used by the campaign


The Clinton camp is alleging the leaks are fake.

 

[Madmick]

Alleged Guccifer 2.0 hack of Clinton Foundation raises suspicions

But there are a number of red flags that suggest the documents are in fact from a previous hack on the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), not a new hack on the Clinton Foundation.

A spot check of some of the people on the donor list against FEC filings found that they all lined up with DCCC contributions.

The Clinton Foundation discloses its donors, and many of the alleged donors published by Guccifer 2.0 do not appear to have given to the organization.

One spreadsheet was allegedly created by a Kevin C. McKeon at DCCC in 2009. There was a Kevin McKeon that worked at DCCC at that time.

The hacker or hackers known as Guccifer 2.0 has previously leaked apparently legitimate documents from breaches at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the DCCC.

But last month he published a spate of files he claimed were stolen from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that in fact appeared to be repurposed from the DCCC hack.

Those documents also appeared to be consistent with what Guccifer 2.0 would have found on the DCCC server. Only one document concerned Pelosi, a "year in review" memo about fundraising numbers — the kinds of donation statistics that would likely be shared with the DCCC.

Guccifer 2.0 claims to be a lone Romanian hacker, but the near totality of the intelligence and security communities take as fact that Guccifer 2.0 is a cover identity for Russian intelligence.

https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/04/clinton-foundation-denies-hack-claims-by-guccifer-2-0/

No secret was made of the political motivation of the supposed hack, and the author even included a shout-out to Wikileaks and Julian Assange. Both were widely criticized earlier this year for releasing what many considered to be private information of citizens alongside the revealing internal emails of the DNC.

Experts have speculated that the hacker in question is in fact allied with — if not outright controlled by — Russian intelligence. That would make this the latest entry in a low-key cyber-skirmish likely aimed at affecting the outcome of next month’s election.

 

[Madmick]

This is almost certainly a proxy OP for @Hans Gruber, who has posted two previous "hacks" from Guccifer 2.0, one claiming that she was a Satanic Priest.

Which raises the question...why are Trump supporters like Hans and Struggle so desperate that they will unconscionably and repeatedly spread Russian propaganda across the web in order to influence the election? How desperate have they become to re-post previously hacked DCCC material not related to the Clinton Foundation and mendaciously assert that it's from the Clinton Foundation-- again and again?

How patriotic can these posters be? How much can they truly care about the USA? It seems they've lost their moral compasses due to a rabid and increasingly irrational hatred of Hillary Clinton. There's plenty about the lady to despise, and plenty of substance to discuss, but we're well past the point of a healthy disruptive civil labor to peer through the veil of this country's political elite, and now vested in deliberately posting fabrications to disease others' minds with a parallel confirmation bias unattached to genuine corruption.

 

[7437]

Nothing like some faked russian documents to show how much you love america.

 

[TheStruggle]

To the surprise of absolutely no one, @Madmick is quick to defend Hillary Clinton and shut down any debate that could favor Donald Trump but somehow missed the last two sentences in the OP.

"If the hack is legit, there are concerns about TARP funds being used by the campaign


The Clinton camp are alleging the leaks are fake."


Keeping in mind these are "Alleged" hacks which have not be verified. But @Madmick thinks by dubbing Trump supporters and removing their abilities to pass these stories along he is doing this forum a justice when he is only contributing to the censorship and left wing tyranny he claims to be against in the first place. Another hardcore leftists parading as a 'centrist'.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Doesn't make much sense to release fake shit after having released a bunch of legitimate documents. What's the point?

 

[TheStruggle]

Doesn't make much sense to release fake shit after having released a bunch of legitimate documents. What's the point?

After the initial DNC Leaks dug up legit information on the DNC. The democrats have now moved to blaming any future information on Russian hackers in order to shut down debate, minimize coverage, and take the heat off themselves. You see it working to perfection ITT.

 

[Madmick]

After the initial DNC Leaks dug up legit information on the DNC. The democrats have now moved to blaming any future information on Russian hackers in order to shut down debate, minimize coverage, and take the heat off themselves. You see it working to perfection ITT.

I notice this Hollywood script came without any evidence.

To the surprise of absolutely no one, @Madmick is quick to defend Hillary Clinton and shut down any debate that could favor Donald Trump but somehow missed the last two sentences in the OP.

"If the hack is legit, there are concerns about TARP funds being used by the campaign


The Clinton camp are alleging the leaks are fake."


Keeping in mind these are "Alleged" hacks which have not be verified. But @Madmick thinks by dubbing Trump supporters and removing their abilities to pass these stories along he is doing this forum a justice when he is only contributing to the censorship and left wing tranny he claims to be against in the first place. Another hardcore leftists parading as a 'centrist'.

It's not the Clinton camp I quoted. It was The Hill, a highly respected and staunchly conservative journalistic body in D.C. that reports strictly on political matters. Here, verify with the Conservapedia:
http://www.conservapedia.com/The_Hill

The Hill is a conservative newspaper and website founded in 1994. They are located in Washington D.C. and are a subsidiary of News Communications.

It makes it clear that the hacks are almost certainly not legit, and that the hacker in question, Guccifer 2.0, is an alias for a collective of Russian hackers. Techcrunch, an online news website that specializes in tech coverage, and doesn't have a reputation for a political character, corroborates this.

Meanwhile, who exactly is the source of your claims? "Guccifer 2.0" himself. Intredasting.


Yeah, there's a fake conservative, here, alright.

 

[in the]

I'm waiting for verification on this. Either it's a troll/smear job, or it's exactly what most of us have thought all along - that "public servants" are feeding at the trough at the expense of all of us.

Using TARP bailout money for personal gain is a HUGE no-no.

 

[JayPettryMMA]

left wing tranny he claims to be

Is there something you'd like to share with us, @Madmick? It's not a safe space here, though.

 

[Madmick]

I'm waiting for verification on this. Either it's a troll/smear job, or it's exactly what most of us have thought all along - that "public servants" are feeding at the trough at the expense of all of us.

Using TARP bailout money for personal gain is a HUGE no-no.

It isn't coming. It's a re-hash. Second time "Guccifer 2.0" has been caught doing this.

Is there something you'd like to share with us, @Madmick? It's not a safe space here, though.

Nothing that would sell tabloids. They're still attached. I also don't even dress fashionably for a man.

 

[TheStruggle]

I notice this Hollywood script came without any evidence.

It's not the Clinton camp I quoted. It was The Hill, a highly respected and staunchly conservative journalistic body in D.C. that reports strictly on political matters. Here, verify with the Conservapedia:
http://www.conservapedia.com/The_Hill

It makes it clear that the hacks are almost certainly not legit, and that the hacker in question, Guccifer 2.0, is an alias for a collective of Russian hackers. Techcrunch, an online news website that specializes in tech coverage, and doesn't have a reputation for a political character, corroborates this.

Meanwhile, who exactly is the source of your claims? "Guccifer 2.0" himself. Intredasting.


Yeah, there's a fake conservative, here, alright.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...d33692-538a-11e6-bbf5-957ad17b4385_story.html



After DNC leaks, Obama hints at possible motive for Russia to help Trump



President Obama on Tuesday waded into the controversy over the leak of Democratic National Committee emails, saying the hack of party records was characteristic of Russian government behavior and suggesting a potential motive for that country to meddle in the U.S. presidential election.

“What we do know is that the Russians hack our systems, not just government systems but private systems,” Obama told NBC. “What the motives were in terms of the leaks, all that — I can’t say directly. What I do know is that Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed admiration for Vladimir Putin.”

Obama’s comments align with those made Sunday by Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook, who said the Russian government was behind last week’s release of DNC documents on the website WikiLeaks as a way to help Trump.

 

[Quipling]

I'm going to be nominating madmick for the biggest hardcore leftist in this year's warroom awards. Thanks for the hot tip, @TheStruggle ! I'd always pegged madmick as something of a reactionary centrist, myself, but I've definitely seen the light after your expose.

EDIT:

NOMINATING NOT DOMINATING BOY IS MY FACE RED

 

[Wadtucket]

From reading this thread, the main thing I learned is that @Madmick is a left wing tranny prone to blowing wad

I approve

Any unbiased confirmations regarding whether this leak is real yet?

 

[Madmick]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...d33692-538a-11e6-bbf5-957ad17b4385_story.html

After DNC leaks, Obama hints at possible motive for Russia to help Trump

President Obama on Tuesday waded into the controversy over the leak of Democratic National Committee emails, saying the hack of party records was characteristic of Russian government behavior and suggesting a potential motive for that country to meddle in the U.S. presidential election.

“What we do know is that the Russians hack our systems, not just government systems but private systems,” Obama told NBC. “What the motives were in terms of the leaks, all that — I can’t say directly. What I do know is that Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed admiration for Vladimir Putin.”

Obama’s comments align with those made Sunday by Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook, who said the Russian government was behind last week’s release of DNC documents on the website WikiLeaks as a way to help Trump.

This is where you fail to understand how "evidence" works. That is merely evidence that the Intelligence community will cast the allegation that Russia did this. If Russia did this, which is the most likely possibility, as has been confirmed by tech bloggers and security specialists who have reviewed details of the hacks, then what else can they say and not be victims of your self-fulfilling corruption allegation? Hell, Putin has openly mocked the DNC with a finger on his nose and a smirk on his face. He's isn't even pretending to hide his gloating.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...at-we-know-about-russias-role-dnc-email-leak/

"The consensus that Russia hacked the DNC is at this point very strong, albeit not unanimous," said cybersecurity consultant Matt Tait, who has been critical of Clinton’s email practices. "The consensus that Russia hacked the DNC in support of Trump is, by contrast, plausible, but something for which the jury at this stage is very much still out."

That wasn't your claim. Your claim implies that the Democrats are falsely smearing a presumably non-Russian (Romanian) hacker by asserting that he is Russian. This would entail that you can confirm the identity of the hacker and that he isn't Russian. You have provided no evidence of this.

 

[44nutman]

Doesn't make much sense to release fake shit after having released a bunch of legitimate documents. What's the point?

Did you watch the debates? Trump gassed and lost. Then he was tweeting at 3am for me to check out some sex tape, which I did. Dude has had a terrible week. Text book politics change the narrative.
Now these hackers have pushed too much, they are now being portrayed as Working with Russians.
Craziest election ever.

 

[TheStruggle]

Is @Madmick EdKulzer on The Hill?

Noticing they are using the same sources and Rhetoric


http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecu...dation-raises-suspicions#.V_QmStQ5Jjo.twitter

 

[44nutman]

To the surprise of absolutely no one, @Madmick is quick to defend Hillary Clinton and shut down any debate that could favor Donald Trump but somehow missed the last two sentences in the OP.

"If the hack is legit, there are concerns about TARP funds being used by the campaign


The Clinton camp are alleging the leaks are fake."


Keeping in mind these are "Alleged" hacks which have not be verified. But @Madmick thinks by dubbing Trump supporters and removing their abilities to pass these stories along he is doing this forum a justice when he is only contributing to the censorship and left wing tyranny he claims to be against in the first place. Another hardcore leftists parading as a 'centrist'.

Should have left it as left wing tranny, instead of the ninja edit.

 

[lecter]

I fucking hate those 400lbs hackers.
However I allow myself some hypocrisy and love leaks as long as they could harm Clinton & Co

 

[Madmick]

Doesn't make much sense to release fake shit after having released a bunch of legitimate documents. What's the point?

Easy. Political mileage. Squeeze that cheese.

Is @Madmick EdKulzer on The Hill?

Noticing they are using the same sources and Rhetoric


http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecu...dation-raises-suspicions#.V_QmStQ5Jjo.twitter