Fights to make after TUF 28 Finale and UFC FN 142 according to JM Barrie

[JM Barrie]

#7 HW Brazil
VS

#5 HW Russia


JDS wants to run it back with Overeem but I dont like that fight. The fight is done and dusted. The HW division doesnt need anymore rematches. Isn't that why we got rid of Cain? No more rematches in a shallow division, OK.
Now the Russian is coming off a loss but so what. He is ranked #5 and was on a 4 fight winning streak. Was on his way to a title too. I think this is a good fight all the way around. The Russian could get back on track. Even if JDS loses he wont take big power shots. Its a win win fight.

#6 WW Nigeria
VS
Winner of

#5 WW USA
VS

Former Bellator and OneFC champion USA



I don't care what Dana says about wanting him to face Woodley next. He's a liar. Kamaru just headlined a TUF finale and he wasn't even a coach. He is 9-0 in the UFC and he's still treated like a kid no one wants. I think Dana is yanking his chain when he says he wants Woodley next.
Besides, Woodley can't be next. Colby has to face Woodley. He had the interim belt, for Pete Sakes.
Kamaru can face the winner of Lawler VS Askren.

#13 LHW Brazil
VS

#8 LHW USA



I don't think rankings matter for this fight. Rua will fight him because he will fight whoever the UFC gives him. Reyes won't mind going down in rankings because it is Shogun Rua he gets to fight. If he don't wanna fight Rua then there is something wrong with this fighter.
This fight is a DAMN good fight. I want to see this exciting fight. Thank you.

#3 Flyweight USA
VS

#12 BW Mexico



The Flyweight division is over with whether Joseph likes it or not. Put on some muscle mass and fight.
Perez is on a 6 fight win streak at BW but with no stand out names in todays times. Its a good fight to see where the Flyweights are in the fight game.

Spain
VS

#14 HW Netherlands



Juan is 38 years old. He doesnt have time to dip his toes in the pool. He just won the TUF title via keylock. Hes only loss is to Vitaly Minakov back in 2011.
Struve is on a 3 fight losing streak but he is still ranked. Get it on.

Australia
VS

Poland



That's Jim Crute and Marcin Prachino BTW.
UFC should give Marcin another chance in the UFC. He fought Sam Alvey and Magomed Ankalaev.
Now do I say give him another chance because I want Jim to go 2-0 in the UFC? Yes, yes I do.

 

[Arm Barbarian]

according to JM Barrie

 

[TITS]

Who the fuck is Jim Barrie?

 

[TITS]

Also, who the fuck is Pete Sakes? Is he foreign?

 

[juggernaut986]

I'd like to see Ben Sosoli on UFC 234. The only guy on TUF that Juan Espino couldn't finish. Since Hunt is on the way out Ben Sosoli and Tai Tuivasa are the new breed of Samoan heavyweights. Sosoli actually has a decent ground game.

 

[felmmando]

#3 Flyweight USA
VS

#12 BW Mexico



The Flyweight division is over with whether Joseph likes it or not. Put on some muscle mass and fight.
Perez is on a 6 fight win streak at BW but with no stand out names in todays times. Its a good fight to see where the Flyweights are in the fight game.

I don't know on what basis you say it's over. Benavidez is entirely right to point out that the division still puts on excellent fights and that things just got more interesting at the top. Of course, there were rumors that it was over by fiat, that the company would arbitrarily dissolve it, but Dana White has refused to confirm them. Do you know something he doesn't?

 

[JM Barrie]

Also, who the fuck is Pete Sakes? Is he foreign?

The phrases “for Pete’s sake” and “for the love of Pete” are mild oaths. They originated as substitutes for something stronger—“for Christ’s sake,” “for God’s sake,” “for the love of God,” and so on.The Oxford English Dictionary explains that the name “Pete” in these exclamations is chiefly “a euphemistic replacement” for God.The phrase “for Pete’s sake” was first recorded in 1903, according to OED citations, followed by “for the love of Pete” in 1906, and “in the name of Pete” in 1942.The intent, in case you didn’t already know, is to express “exasperation or annoyance,” the dictionary says.

Why “Pete” rather than “Phil” or “Fred” or “Percy”?

We don’t know, though the Morris Dictionary of Word and Phrase Origins speculates (without offering any evidence) that whoever coined “for Pete’s sake” may have had St. Peter in mind.

These “Pete” expressions belong to a large class of euphemistic phrases that developed as substitutes for more irreverent oaths.

https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2011/02/pete.html

according to JM Barrie

Sir James Matthew Barrie, 1st Baronet, OM was a Scottish novelist and playwright, best remembered today as the creator of Peter Pan.

I don't know on what basis you say it's over. Benavidez is entirely right to point out that the division still puts on excellent fights and that things just got more interesting at the top. Of course, there were rumors that it was over by fiat, that the company would arbitrarily dissolve it, but Dana White has refused to confirm them. Do you know something he doesn't?

lots are being cut
lots are being moved up
mighty mouse was traded


its over

 

[TITS]

The phrases “for Pete’s sake” and “for the love of Pete” are mild oaths. They originated as substitutes for something stronger—“for Christ’s sake,” “for God’s sake,” “for the love of God,” and so on.The Oxford English Dictionary explains that the name “Pete” in these exclamations is chiefly “a euphemistic replacement” for God.The phrase “for Pete’s sake” was first recorded in 1903, according to OED citations, followed by “for the love of Pete” in 1906, and “in the name of Pete” in 1942.The intent, in case you didn’t already know, is to express “exasperation or annoyance,” the dictionary says.

Why “Pete” rather than “Phil” or “Fred” or “Percy”?

We don’t know, though the Morris Dictionary of Word and Phrase Origins speculates (without offering any evidence) that whoever coined “for Pete’s sake” may have had St. Peter in mind.

These “Pete” expressions belong to a large class of euphemistic phrases that developed as substitutes for more irreverent oaths.

https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2011/02/pete.html




Sir James Matthew Barrie, 1st Baronet, OM was a Scottish novelist and playwright, best remembered today as the creator of Peter Pan.









lots are being cut
lots are being moved up
mighty mouse was traded


its over

I don't care for your shtick.

 

[Sweater of AV]

Juan Espino is Spanish Frank Mir. Anyways, I doubt Usman fights the winner of Robbie-Askren but who knows. Also Jon and Gus are fighting for the honor of facing Shogun.

 

[JM Barrie]

I don't care for your shtick.

For Petes sake.