What a dumb statementHBK was their lowest drawing champion and the WWF was getting killed by the competition.
And the company starting being successful when he was gone.![]()
Company was almost dead in the dirt in 96.....who was their face of the company?What a dumb statement
Was HBK their lowest drawing champion when he had the title from Nov 97 to april 98? The company started being successful when he was champion.
Also, a lot of numbers were turning around when Shawn became champ in 96 from the previous years.
how did wm 14, WM 20, WM 23, WM 26 do with Shawn in the main event ?
And when the company was turning the nose up who was main eventing the company ?Company was almost dead in the dirt in 96.....who was their face of the company?
Steve Austin was main eventing the company when they started turning it around.And when the company was turning the nose up who was main eventing the company ?
People that try to diminish nash or HBK based on their runs in the mid 90s are either ignorant and weren’t watching at the time or don’t understand context
Austin was injured from summerslam 97 till 98 and Michaels was champion when the company was quickly gaining momentumSteve Austin was main eventing the company when they started turning it around.
Look I get you are an HBK fan, his run after 02 was great.
But can we be honest about his 90s, I would even say outside of the MTL screwjob, Bret Harts career wouldn't be missed and I'm a biased Bret mark.
No.Austin was injured from summerslam 97 till 98 and Michaels was champion when the company was quickly gaining momentum
Steve Austin was main eventing the company when they started turning it around.
Look I get you are an HBK fan, his run after 02 was great.
But can we be honest about his 90s, I would even say outside of the MTL screwjob, Bret Harts career wouldn't be missed and I'm a biased Bret mark.
If ur brain were in a birds skull it would fly backwards.No.
Austin challenging McMahon was the first time they beat WCW in the ratings.
That's a fact.