Eddie Alvarez vs Nate Diaz

Eddie gets outstruck but wins a split decision via lay n praying. Then he goes on social media and claims he is "the most violent man in the UFC"
 
Eddie wins that one I think would be fun as hell to watch

Lots of people count Eddie out now a days and that's a mistake
 
It would be a war but I think Nate would take it with his boxing and durability.
 
Eddie via gameplan. Easy money.

Diaz is average. He has some good wins but gets dominated by anyone with a solid plan.
 
20falarVerdades said:
Eddie gets outstruck but wins a split decision via lay n praying. Then he goes on social media and claims he is "the most violent man in the UFC"
Click to expand...
Nate historically has not lost to "wrestlers"

he's lost to guys who can wrestle that also have excellent top games.


also fights that happened 3-5+ years ago In a pre usada era. Something tells me we should probably assess current Diaz, not Diaz from 5 years.
 
a 3 round fight favors eddie a 5 round favors nate, nate needs to get in his head as we saw with conor eddie is not strong there keep it standing up keep the range and nats got this eddies chin is also long gone

many dont know b/c of stats but eddie is small hes not much taller then frankie and he has short reach conor looked another weight class above him when they fought
 
MescalineDreams said:
Nate historically has not lost to "wrestlers"

he's lost to guys who can wrestle that also have excellent top games.


also fights that happened 3-5+ years ago In a pre usada era. Something tells me we should probably assess current Diaz, not Diaz from 5 years.
Click to expand...
Current Diaz is no where to be seen and he's only faced strikers in the last 3 years (MJ/Conor). I don't think he's been working on his TDD
 
BHR said:
a 3 round fight favors eddie a 5 round favors nate, nate needs to get in his head as we saw with conor eddie is not strong there keep it standing up keep the range and nats got this eddies chin is also long gone

many dont know b/c of stats but eddie is small hes not much taller then frankie and he has short reach conor looked another weight class above him when they fought
Click to expand...

You're fucking dumb.
 
Last edited:
MescalineDreams said:
Nate historically has not lost to "wrestlers"

he's lost to guys who can wrestle that also have excellent top games.


also fights that happened 3-5+ years ago In a pre usada era. Something tells me we should probably assess current Diaz, not Diaz from 5 years.
Click to expand...
I like this idea
 
Nate sits around with his brother in their wheel chairs and they talk about the weather. They're retired and don't even fight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,264,955
Messages
57,313,874
Members
175,636
Latest member
whocares1993

Share this page

Back
Top