- Joined
- Jul 28, 2015
- Messages
- 11,031
- Reaction score
- 5,631
MMA has atomweight and straw weight mainly for women. But that’s enough for mma.Seems to be working just fine. You likely just don't realize how expansive boxing. Certain weight classes have strong followings in other parts of the world, so even if you think "no one cares about ____ weight", it is likely incorrect.
Atomweight and Bridgerweight are not fully recognized divisions, so I am not sure why you're citing that. It's as silly as someone citing cruiserweight in MMA. Im not even sure what your point is about atomweight, since you already mentioned it doesn't have a world championship. MMA has atomweight also.
Also, i didnt mention MMA, but since you brought it up, UFC does not have enough weight classes and some of these differences are ridiculous. Only 8 is just ridiculous. Many MMA fighters and trainers have expressed the same opinion.
Anyway, back to boxing, what is this bs about specific weight classes being popular somewhere. If every 3 weight classes were reshaped into 2 it’ll be much better. You are acting like I’m being dana white and wanting to erase flyweight cause it’s not popular. Fuck that, I always prefer lower weights cause technique matters more there (thus it’s more pleasing to the trained/practicing eye). You are putting words in my mouth and taking this emotionally personal.
The main 17 weight classes should be merged into 14 weight classes.
I dont give a flying fuck about billionaire promoters getting one less pool, jet, or mansion… are you talking as a fan or being weird just to argue? Remmember recently when Crawford unified the belts and called out the WBC for their additional fees? They should not feel more special than the other sanctioning bodies.
When I give mu critique for the sport its from a fan’s perspective in a perfect world (that obviously we’ll never have). Not ABC orgs. No bs contracts and promotions holding back big fights and unifications while casuals blindly call fighters ducking.