- Joined
- Apr 29, 2018
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 17,281
Did the ufc create or enable this whole situation in the first place by not trying to push for anti insider gambling laws in mma when they instituted draft kings as their betting company years ago?
Dana was acting pretty suspicious and talking nervously in absolutes when they interviewed him on the betting scandal, where he denies any shadyness and he swares to everyone it was an isolated incident only. Did he reveal a tell when asked about provinces in Canada banning any betting on the ufc (and not other mma orgs)? He seemed annoyed when he dissed Canada as a country in response...if he was truly neutral or uneffected by that then he woulsnt have felt the need to diss canada, right?
but fact is Canada and America being his 2 main betting markets, so losing Canada entirely (starting with provinces buts its spreading) would be a major hit to their operation one would think.
Is James Krause being used as a scapegoat by the ufc similar to how big government and the deep state ocassionaly will investigate and selectively arrest only certain bad actors of corrupt big business like Enron, just to make an example of them while turning a blind eye to all the other blatantly corrupt monopolies and businesses in general using Ponzi schemes to con its investors (in this case gamblers) out of their money?
Because after all they say the government is the biggest mafia of them all, has the ufc been playing as the casino basically and getting to rig the game in their own favor this whole time?
A wise man once said 'the best way to rob a bank is to own one'
Thoughts?
Last edited: