Law British Metropolitan Police Must Disclose If They Are Freemasons

Arkain2K

Si vis pacem, para bellum
@Steel
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
33,657
Reaction score
6,131

Met officers must tell bosses if they are Freemasons, force announces

Move comes amid fears that requirement for Freemasons to ‘protect each other’ could lead to corruption
By Vikram Dodd Police and crime correspondent | Thu 11 Dec 2025




Metropolitan police officers must tell their bosses if they are Freemasons, the force has announced, amid fears membership could be linked to corruption.

Britain’s largest force said anyone who was part or had been a member of a “hierarchical organisation that require members to support and protect each other” must declare it.

The body representing Freemasons condemned the rule and said it would consider legal action.

The issue of Freemasons in the Met has been long-running, but previous commissioners have either thought tougher rules were not justified or not worth the pain.

The current commissioner, Mark Rowley, was moved to act as part of his drive to show the public the force can be trusted.

The Guardian also understands, however, that a recent case of alleged wrongdoing in the force contains allegations that acts under investigation may be linked to Freemasonry.

The Met has held intelligence for years of potential corruption linked to personal relationships formed through membership of the Freemasons, but nothing has been proved.

The force says it surveyed its officers and staff, and that two-thirds backed the restriction because it “affects public perception of police impartiality”.

Commander Simon Messinger said: “After such conclusive results from our consultation, we have decided now is the right time to address longstanding concerns and that public and staff confidence must take precedence over the secrecy of any membership organisation.

“Our decision does not mean any member of staff cannot join the Freemasons or another similar organisation.”

Adrian Marsh of the United Grand Lodge of England said: “Our values of integrity, friendship, respect and service are paramount in Freemasonry and have never been of more importance. We see this action as unwarranted, and we are carefully considering an appropriate response.”



The issue has dogged policing, with numerous allegations that Freemasonry membership has led to people covering up for wrongdoing in keeping the organisation’s credo that members stand by one another.

The official inquiry into the 1987 murder of the private investigator Daniel Morgan and police corruption that hampered the hunt to find his killers recommended tighter rules on Freemasons in policing.

The inquiry’s report in 2021 said: “A source of recurring suspicion and mistrust in the investigations of Daniel Morgan’s murder has been police officers’ membership of the Freemasons.”

It noted that one detective involved was a Freemason who later went to work with a prime suspect, and that “10 police officers who were prominent in the Daniel Morgan murder investigations were Freemasons”.

But it also stated: “The panel has not seen evidence that masonic channels were corruptly used in connection with either the commission of the murder or to subvert the police investigations.”

Police lodges have been set up, such as the Manor of St James for Met officers, and Sine Favore, which was set up in 2010 by Police Federation members.

One of those was the Met officer John Tully, who went on to chair the federation. After his retirement from policing, he was an administrator at the United Grand Lodge of England.

Tully told the Guardian that membership never did him any favours, serving his entire career as a constable. “If they are going to make Freemasons declare their membership, are they going to make them declare their membership of their local tennis club? They need to be consistent,” he said.

The former Police Federation chair Steve White has said Freemasons were blocking reform and thwarting the progress of women and people from black and minority ethnic communities in the ranks.

In a Guardian interview to mark his departure as the leader of rank-and-file officers in England and Wales in 2017, he said: “There have been occasions when colleagues of mine have suspected that Freemasons have been an obstacle to reform.

“We need to make sure that people are making decisions for the right reasons and there is a need for future continuing cultural reform in the Fed, which should be reflective of the makeup of policing.”

The Grand Lodge says of the history of Freemasonry: “The widely accepted view from many masonic scholars is that Freemasonry originates from the medieval stonemasons that built many of our castles and cathedrals.”

It says the first recorded induction of someone into Freemasonry in the UK was in 1646 in Warrington. Members join lodges, with the first grand lodge formed in London in 1717.

 
Last edited:

Freemasons to sue Met police over membership declaration

By Aurelia Foster | 17 December 2025

ef988a90-d698-11f0-a892-01d657345866.jpg.webp


The Metropolitan Police faces legal action over its plans to force officers to declare Freemason membership.

Earlier this month, the Met said Freemasonry membership would be added to its declarable associations policy, following a review into the 1987 unsolved murder of a private detective Daniel Morgan that cited Freemasonry as a source of "mistrust" in investigations.

Freemason organisations have warned the Met they will seek a judicial review if it proceeds with the move, which they say is discriminatory.

The Met confirmed it had received a letter before claim from the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE), the government body of Freemasonry in England.

The force said it would not be appropriate to comment further.

UGLE, which dates back to 1717, describes Freemason societies as being among the "oldest social and charitable organisations in the world", with its principles being "integrity, friendship, respect and service".

However, they are widely believed to be secretive societies and have previously been linked to allegations of corruption within the Met.

The Met's decision means officers and staff are now required to declare membership "past or present" of any organisation that is "hierarchical, has confidential membership and requires members to support and protect each other".

'Aura of mistrust'


The UGLE said that this requirement could undermine the public credibility of Freemasons, and could breach their human rights, as well data protection rules.

Adrian Marsh, grand secretary of UGLE, said: "Freemasonry has the highest moral and ethical standards.

"The decision by the Metropolitan Police casts an aura of mistrust over the entire Freemason community... We now have no choice but to take legal action to challenge this unlawful decision."

Mr Marsh called on force bosses to withdraw the move and "work it through sensibly" with the Freemasons to avoid expensive legal action.

UGLE added that the requirement of Freemasons to support and protect each other comes with the caveat that this must not be to the detriment to their family or the law.

The body also claims it was not properly included in the consultation process and that fewer than 5% of officers and staff completed a survey on the issue.

The Met's decision followed a review into the force's handling of the unsolved murder case of Mr Morgan.

The 37-year-old father of two was killed with an axe in the car park of the Golden Lion pub in Sydenham, south-east London, on 10 March 1987.

A string of inquiries since have unearthed allegations of corruption.

The 2021 report said police officers' membership of the Freemasons had been "a source of recurring suspicion and mistrust in the investigations".

The Met's decision follows a survey of officers and staff which showed two-thirds of respondents felt membership of such organisations affects perception of police impartiality and public trust, the force said.

More recently, Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has pushed the plan to declare membership as part of wider moves to improve transparency in the Met.

Cdr Simon Messinger previously said it was the "right time" to address long-standing concerns and that public and staff confidence "must take precedence over the secrecy of any membership organisation".

He added that the decision did not mean staff could not join the Freemasons or another similar organisation.

 
Last edited:
I've been through the entire Freemasons Hall in London, every single room including the plant rooms, it's actually very old and an interesting building.

I think it should be a requirement to declare everything including Religion, Politics etc.... and profiling done across the board to check against standards applied during arrests and what sorts of arrest levels they apply to certain groups in certain areas and check it against norms and deviation.

Certain groups are know to infiltrate government bodies to enable them to protect their ideology, religion or organisation.
 
There will always be police officers in every single country that will protect other police officers no matter what. It could be based upon anything from the badge to friendships to religious reasons. Maybe if they simply just made corruption against the law….oh, wait.

I have very little respect for the British government and uk police in general. Some things they do very well-like dealing with knife wielding suspects without using guns in most cases-but the uk laws that allow ridiculous amounts of overstepping make me sick. For example, their prosecutions of social media posts and protests that are selectively enforced. I have seen news reports on everything from people being sentenced to prison for social media posts (while :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes go free) to a woman stopped and almost arrested for having a Star of David necklace that was offending Muslims and pro Palestine protesters in the street. It’s nauseating.

On a side note, if you have not watched or checked out mobland on paramount, do yourself that favor-show is fucking awesome and Tim hardy is a badass.
 
Masons have always been such wonderful, honorable people that it's hard to see a problem here.

"Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! It is he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable, blinds feeble, sensual or selfish souls? Doubt it not!"

Albert Pike, "Morals and Dogma of the ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry"

When the Mason learns that the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the mystery of his craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onwards and upwards he must prove his ability to properly apply [this] energy.”

Manley P Hall, "Lost Keys of Freemasonry"

“Out of evil comes good, however, and the confusion of tongues gave rise to 'the ancient practice of Masons conversing without the use of speech.'”

Arthur Edward Waite, A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and of Cognate Instituted Mysteries: Their Rites, Literature and History

"When the human race learns to read the language of symbolism, a great veil will fall from the eyes of men.

Dollarnote_siegel_hq.jpg


They shall then know truth and, more than that, they shall realize that from the beginning truth has been in the world unrecognized, save by a small but gradually increasing number appointed by the Lords of the Dawn as ministers to the needs of human creatures struggling to regain consciousness of divinity."

Manly P. Hall, Melchizedek and the Mystery of Fire

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment....

JFK: https://www.jfklibrary.org/archives...can-newspaper-publishers-association-19610427




End Note: This article, the whole thing is what they call a PSYOP. It would be onion-ish funny having a masonic press telling the world that mason cops must report their status to their mason bosses, if it didn't bode so horribly for future built around the simple idea of a free society.

Shit... the door's this way, right?

Later, Pimps.
 
The freemasons were publically known to be main players in Irish independence and the troubles for over 200 years. Why the sudden interest in them now?
 
Back
Top