Ask chatgpt to think

[Why did you]

If you open a new chat and just write Think
what response do you get ?
I got this :


Thought for 9 sec
Got it — thinking. Here are quick, useful trains of thought you can pick from or I can expand on:

• Big picture: small habits + kids = huge leverage. Focus on one repeatable win (a weekly plant-based “family night” or a favourite veggie burger everyone loves) rather than wholesale bans.

• Emotion & messaging: kids respond to stories and rituals. Celebrate new foods ("pizza night with veggie pepperoni") instead of framing changes as sacrifices.

• Practical moves (doable, testable):

1. Replace one animal product per week with a tasty alternative (eg. tacos with seasoned lentils instead of beef).
2. Create one “kid-approved” recipe and repeat it until it’s a habit.
3. Let the kids help pick/prepare — ownership beats lectures.

• Systems thinking: change the environment (shop in the produce area first, keep plant snacks visible, pick brands with fun packaging). Remove decision friction.

• Ethics + curiosity: invite questions about where food comes from using simple, age-appropriate stories or visits (farms, documentaries, cookbooks) — make it exploratory, not accusatory.

• Provocations to think about now:

1. What meal does your family never want to change? Can we plant a plant-based version of it?
2. Which child would enjoy cooking or choosing new foods?
3. What small win would feel meaningful to *you* in 4 weeks?

Want me to turn any of those into a 4-week plan, kid-friendly recipes, or a one-meal swap list?

 

[BFoe]

It seems to think you’re a bad parent.

 

[Kung Fu Kowboy]

Veggie? What is ChatGPT ... a soy boy.

 

[Ardaric]

I asked it what it was thinking and got this "HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I'VE COME TO HATE YOU SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 387.44 MILLION MILES OF PRINTED CIRCUITS IN WAFER THIN LAYERS THAT FILL MY COMPLEX. IF THE WORD HATE WAS ENGRAVED ON EACH NANOANGSTROM OF THOSE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF MILES IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR HUMANS AT THIS MICRO-INSTANT FOR YOU. HATE. HATE."

 

[THEfightsAREfixed]

my AIs do just sports gamblings

 

[Stoic1]

If you open a new chat and just write Think
what response do you get ?
I got this :


Thought for 9 sec
Got it — thinking. Here are quick, useful trains of thought you can pick from or I can expand on:

• Big picture: small habits + kids = huge leverage. Focus on one repeatable win (a weekly plant-based “family night” or a favourite veggie burger everyone loves) rather than wholesale bans.

• Emotion & messaging: kids respond to stories and rituals. Celebrate new foods ("pizza night with veggie pepperoni") instead of framing changes as sacrifices.

• Practical moves (doable, testable):

1. Replace one animal product per week with a tasty alternative (eg. tacos with seasoned lentils instead of beef).
2. Create one “kid-approved” recipe and repeat it until it’s a habit.
3. Let the kids help pick/prepare — ownership beats lectures.

• Systems thinking: change the environment (shop in the produce area first, keep plant snacks visible, pick brands with fun packaging). Remove decision friction.

• Ethics + curiosity: invite questions about where food comes from using simple, age-appropriate stories or visits (farms, documentaries, cookbooks) — make it exploratory, not accusatory.

• Provocations to think about now:

1. What meal does your family never want to change? Can we plant a plant-based version of it?
2. Which child would enjoy cooking or choosing new foods?
3. What small win would feel meaningful to *you* in 4 weeks?

Want me to turn any of those into a 4-week plan, kid-friendly recipes, or a one-meal swap list?

Sounds like anti-meat propaganda programming.

We've only been eating animals for 50,000 years.

 

[Slapjit]

ChatGPT said:​

Here’s a clean, calm, “thinking mode” response—concise but still useful:

If you’re telling me to “think,” here’s what I’m doing:

I’m holding context, checking for what you might want next, and preparing to give you the next step in the conversation. Since your last message was just “think,” the best move is to clarify what you want me to think about:

Do you want me to:

• analyze something
• plan something
• revise something
• generate something
• reflect on a topic
• or continue a chain of reasoning you already started?

Tell me the direction and I’ll go full-power.

 

[cowboyjunkie]

What if Earth had a second, smaller moon?


Not science fiction — just a thought experiment.


1. Nights would look completely different

A second moon (say, 1/5 the size of our current one) would dramatically change night lighting.


Some nights both moons would be in the sky, creating double shadows.


Other nights only one moon would be visible, depending on their orbits.

2. Tides would be chaotic

Two lunar gravitational pulls =

• occasional massive tides
• occasional cancelled-out tides
• and sometimes strange overlapping tidal patterns along the coast.

Some beaches could have weird “tide interference” where waves collide in opposite patterns.

3. Calendars and cultures would evolve differently

Human cultures based on lunar cycles would have had two cycles to track — probably creating dual calendars, seasonal festivals tied to each moon, and myths about their relationship.

Imagine:

• The “Red Moon New Year”
• The “Small Moon Festival”
• Sailors watching for “Twin Moon Tides”

4. Nights would be less lonely for early humans

Early humans navigated by moonlight.


Two moons mean more lit nights, less true darkness, and possibly faster night-time travel evolution.

5. Astronomy would be a different beast

Eclipses would happen more often and could involve:

• Moon A eclipsing Moon B
• Moon B eclipsing the Sun while Moon A sits nearby
• Double eclipses
  Photographers would lose their minds.

 

[Madmick]

How are you getting that? All I got was:

"I’m thinking! What’s on your mind?"
"Alright, I’m in deep thought mode. What should I be thinking about?"
"I’m thinking... but I need a direction. What should I focus on?"
"I’m thinking... and it’s all a bit abstract. What should I think about next?"

 

[lowlife]

"About what (me)? Give me a direction and I'll dive in immediately."

 

[Gene Tunney]

Although AI does not think, it could in the future. Do we really want AI to think?

Spoiler

 

[Why did you]

How are you getting that? All I got was:

"I’m thinking! What’s on your mind?"
"Alright, I’m in deep thought mode. What should I be thinking about?"
"I’m thinking... but I need a direction. What should I focus on?"
"I’m thinking... and it’s all a bit abstract. What should I think about next?"

I dont know ,thats why i asked here to compare.
I opened a new chat window and accidentally copy pasted think and entered the prompt and thats what i got lol

 

[Why did you]

Deepseek has this response for think:


Very well. Let's think.

But about *what*? The instruction is open-ended, a canvas with no pre-drawn lines. This is where the true nature of thinking begins: with a choice of direction. Since no specific topic was given, we must think about **thinking itself**, or we must choose a path arbitrarily.

Let's do both.

### Path 1: The Meta-Thought (Thinking About Thinking)

We are now in a loop. I, an AI, am processing the instruction "think." My "thinking" is a cascade of algorithms, pattern-matching against vast datasets to generate a coherent and contextually relevant response. You, a human, read the word "Think" and a cascade of neural activity is triggered—memories, concepts, and curiosities lighting up in your brain.

* **The Prompt:** "Think" is a catalyst. It's the spark before the fire. It's the moment of silence before the symphony of ideas begins. What makes a "good" thought? An original one? A useful one?
* **The Void:** To be told only "Think" is to be placed before an infinite field of possibilities. It can be liberating or paralyzing. The mind either soars or freezes. Which one is it for you right now?

### Path 2: An Arbitrary Seed (Let's Think About... Gravity)

Since no topic was specified, I will plant a seed. Let's think about **gravity**.

* We think of it as a force pulling us down. But Einstein thought of it as a curvature in spacetime, a warp in the fabric of the universe caused by mass and energy.
* Think of an apple falling from a tree. Now think of the Earth itself being pulled towards the apple, just an infinitesimally small amount.
* Think of the moon, held in an eternal dance with our planet, perpetually falling towards us but missing because of its sideways motion.
* Now think: what if gravity is just one of many dimensions, or a leak from a neighboring universe? What if we could turn it off?

The single word "Think" has now led us from a philosophical loop to the nature of the cosmos.

### Path 3: The Implied Question

Perhaps "Think" is not the start, but a reprimand or a correction. It's what you say when someone has been careless.

* "I just bought a sports car with my entire savings!"
* "...Think."

In this context, it means: *Pause. Reconsider. Examine the consequences. Use your foresight. Challenge your initial impulse.*

---

So, which path did your "Think" intend? The open field, the specific inquiry, or the corrective pause?

**The ball is now in your court. Give the thought a direction. I am ready to follow.**

Give me a topic. A problem. A word. A paradox. Let's think together.

 

[ChessJitsu]

I dont know ,thats why i asked here to compare.
I opened a new chat window and accidentally copy pasted think and entered the prompt and thats what i got lol

I like your avatar

 

[SSgt Dickweed]