- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 1,564
- Reaction score
- 4,601
So background here is - Ariel has a very cosy relationship with WWE. Via BT sport he's done some hugely softball interviews with people from over there and its well known that he's got a long standing relationship with Nick Khan who is now running shit over there.
Last weekend they did a TV taping and PPV in Montreal, which is obv Ariel's hometown, and Ariel appeared on the TV show and then the kick off show for the PPV fully involved in their product. Tony Khan, who is the owner/CEO of their competitor AEW, then tweeted at Ariel saying he was a fraud and as much of a journalist as the guy on their show who does their backstage interviews.
Ariel then responded by taking shots at Khan over how his dad is responsible for his success and claiming he only got involved with WWE because he couldn't properly cover UFC on BT due to Dana and that its ok for him to be biased in that arena bc he doesn't consider himself a wrestling journalist.
Whilst I back Ariel over the likes of Paddy and Dana in their arguments - this is a situation where he is doing the exact same thing he's (rightly) taken shots at MMA 'journalists' for in doing softball interviews for the broadcast partner (like a WWE Brett Okamoto) and what he (rightly) said he would never do with UFC which is be paid/accept gifts directly from them to appear on their programme doing what they want (unless he flew to Montreal and did all this for free which I don't believe). He then goes on to kind of suggest he'd be open to appearing as a character on WWE in the future.
Someone calls that out and he is extremely salty about the whole thing and tells anyone who 'he might have disappointed' to 'fuck off cause he I'm not going to live with these bizarro rules you want to put on me' - which is like these are the rules which you so strongly have put in on the other guys in MMA yet you'd like to cover wrestling also and not abide by them?
Ariel has been getting a lot of praise for putting it on basically the worst people in MMA (Schaub, Paddy, Dana) but he's also quite full of shit on some fronts and can't seem to handle getting called on it.
Last weekend they did a TV taping and PPV in Montreal, which is obv Ariel's hometown, and Ariel appeared on the TV show and then the kick off show for the PPV fully involved in their product. Tony Khan, who is the owner/CEO of their competitor AEW, then tweeted at Ariel saying he was a fraud and as much of a journalist as the guy on their show who does their backstage interviews.
Ariel then responded by taking shots at Khan over how his dad is responsible for his success and claiming he only got involved with WWE because he couldn't properly cover UFC on BT due to Dana and that its ok for him to be biased in that arena bc he doesn't consider himself a wrestling journalist.
Whilst I back Ariel over the likes of Paddy and Dana in their arguments - this is a situation where he is doing the exact same thing he's (rightly) taken shots at MMA 'journalists' for in doing softball interviews for the broadcast partner (like a WWE Brett Okamoto) and what he (rightly) said he would never do with UFC which is be paid/accept gifts directly from them to appear on their programme doing what they want (unless he flew to Montreal and did all this for free which I don't believe). He then goes on to kind of suggest he'd be open to appearing as a character on WWE in the future.
Someone calls that out and he is extremely salty about the whole thing and tells anyone who 'he might have disappointed' to 'fuck off cause he I'm not going to live with these bizarro rules you want to put on me' - which is like these are the rules which you so strongly have put in on the other guys in MMA yet you'd like to cover wrestling also and not abide by them?
Ariel has been getting a lot of praise for putting it on basically the worst people in MMA (Schaub, Paddy, Dana) but he's also quite full of shit on some fronts and can't seem to handle getting called on it.
Last edited: