- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 5,212
- Reaction score
- 1
Or has no one just gotten creative enough to use them? I'm a big MMA fan, and one of the things I love about is it the freedom to utilize all the different styles to fight. But as I gotten into fighting myself and training stand up, I'm curious as to why these moves haven't been utilized in constructs other than MMA or Muay Thai kickboxing?
Is there any explicit rule against them in boxing?
1. The Hanuman
Essentally all it is is a double uppercut. If you get a guy fast enough to close the distance, this could be a huge knockout blow, and be more effective than a combo.
2. Superman Punch
Very flashy I know, but there isn't any rule against jumping in boxing is there? If anything it would create a different angle to attack.
3. The spinning back fist
Now this is one where I think there may be a rule about. I know in K-1 you have to hit with the top part of your wrist insted of a close side of the hammer fist. But like the other moves, what aspect of this move would make it illegal? Like, I don't see whats wrong with this move as a strike, as long as the nist is the only thing landing.
thoughts/explanation?
Is there any explicit rule against them in boxing?
1. The Hanuman
Essentally all it is is a double uppercut. If you get a guy fast enough to close the distance, this could be a huge knockout blow, and be more effective than a combo.
2. Superman Punch
Very flashy I know, but there isn't any rule against jumping in boxing is there? If anything it would create a different angle to attack.
3. The spinning back fist
Now this is one where I think there may be a rule about. I know in K-1 you have to hit with the top part of your wrist insted of a close side of the hammer fist. But like the other moves, what aspect of this move would make it illegal? Like, I don't see whats wrong with this move as a strike, as long as the nist is the only thing landing.
thoughts/explanation?