Could A Flyweight Ever Be Considered "Baddest Man On The Planet"?

bogeyj

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
482
Reaction score
1,240
could you ever consider a guy as tall as your kid sister to be a "bad motherfucker" or the "baddest man on the planet"? <{yahyou}>

or are phrases like that only used for heavyweights? guys you could actually make the argument for that they could beat up anyone on earth in a 1v1 with no weapons <{you!}>
 
To be the baddest man on the planet means you could fuck every single other man up if necessary.

i don’t see Brandon Moreno doing that to Ngannou.

If there's going to be a 'Baddest Man on the Planet' or a 'World's Most Dangerous Man', then yep, the criteria means they can ruin absolutely anyone and everyone on the, ahem, 'planet'.

So yeah, it can't be a flyweight.

The lightest fighter it's allowed to be is Genki Sudo.
 
Figueiredo looks like a scary mofo in the cage, then you see him standing next to a average person and find out he used to be a hair dresser.
 
What would be more impressive?
If Francis Ngannou beat up 3 235lbs guys at the same time in a bar fight?
Or
If some Flyweight (in street clothes) beat up 3 185lbs guys at the same time in a bar fight?
..bobbing and weaving with like 3 precision jabs…

I’d vote the latter
 
Nobody but a HW or a VERY dominant large LHW could be considered the baddest man on the planet. By definition, weight classes are in place to protect fighters and the HWs are the top of the food chain.

Then why do people on Sherdog always claim that HW is so weak and unskilled?
Fighters are literally starving themselves, sweating out several pounds of body weight, just to fight at LHW or MW. Are they doing that because it’s more challenging and HW is too easy?
 
Back
Top