- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
- Messages
- 9,489
- Reaction score
- 12,920
The UFC allowed Vitor to be on TRT and as a result Bisping lost an eye. Is there a case to sue there if Bispong wasn’t a total UFC shill?
Hunt made 800k at UFC 200 and then spent it all on lawyers trying to sue the UFC. A man who gets a main event fight with fucking Brock Lesnar didn't appreciate the push.Didn’t Hunto try the same thing with Lesnar?
That was one of my favourite timelines
I mean if there was an unsafe work environment and it caused life-long injury that could still hold upThe injury happened in early 2013, and it happened in Brazil. Way past the statute of limitations, and Bisping assumed the risk of injury by engaging in combat.
Yeah, it it wasn't for Vitor, Bisping never would have become champ.That which does not kill us makes us stronger
This imo as a layman, and not a lawyer, seems like the only reasonable response to the question in the title.I pretty sure it commission not in ufc
This. The opportunities that played out for him were/are probably worth more than he'd sue for, and that doesn't even factor in the cost of going up against the UFC's legal team.Bisping later won the title, got paid a fuckload of money in his GSP fight and now works as a commentator in the UFC.
Imma go out on a limb and say he's pretty happy with the organisation.
You just basically /Thread'd this, he can sue the UFC but most likely wont win, in the case of Mark Hunt he probably had a better case because 1 Lesnar tested positive and 2, they knowingly that he most likely would cheat still got him the special exemption, it wasnt like Vitor's sort of general TRT exemption for anyone applying for it at the time, Lesnar's was a pass to cheat USADA testing.He could definitely sue them, doesn't mean he'd win.
Edit: Mark Hunt sued for Brock Lesnar being allowed to fight him despite failing drug tests. Don't think he won.