Who Wins In a Face Off: Colby or Jake Paul

BayAreaGuy

Good Day
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
15,204
Reaction score
2,587
I'm leaning towards Colby because he has more experience talking for long periods.

Thoughts?
 
they would both enjoy their awful shit talk while the rest of us are like
<{clintugh}>
 
I'm leaning towards Colby because he has more experience talking for long periods.

Thoughts?
Colby and its not even close. Most the stuff that Colby says actually makes sense, is entertaining, and is hilarious, including the nicknames he gives people. The stuff Jake says is just stupid, makes no sense, and is cringey.
 
Colby isn't even a good shit-talker. TF you on TS?
<{katwhu}>
 
If Askren can humiliate Jake in the presser then it would be easy work for Colby.
 
Colby and its not even close. Most the stuff that Colby says actually makes sense, is entertaining, and is hilarious, including the nicknames he gives people. The stuff Jake says is just stupid, makes no sense, and is cringey.
Guess Colby's publicist team is heavy on sherdog. Because none of what this guy just said is true
 
I'm leaning towards Colby because he has more experience talking for long periods.

Thoughts?
Unless it's Conor, Jorge or Tony, Jake Paul would not lose the face off against anyone smaller than him. And I know he wouldn't pull that schtick when he's facing off with someone taller than him.
 
Colby is a bunch of scripted lines and nothing more.

When he doesn't have those, he just yells like a child. Kind of like when Usman reminded him about breaking his face.
 
Colby is a bunch of scripted lines and nothing more.

When he doesn't have those, he just yells like a child. Kind of like when Usman reminded him about breaking his face.
What you said is true but let's not pretend Usman is any better. He had to break out of his analyst role to utter that three times.
 
What you said is true but let's not pretend Usman is any better. He had to break out of his analyst role to utter that three times.

Not sure how this is relevant to the topic at hand.

Usman also doesn't need to trash talk to be relevant. He remains relevant by fighting frequently and winning.
 
Not sure how this is relevant to the topic at hand.

Usman also doesn't need to trash talk to be relevant. He remains relevant by fighting frequently and winning.
What do you mean relevant? You literally brought it up. What he did was stoop to Colby's level by breaking out of his ESPN analyst role and trash talk with Colby. Before you say he only spoke the truth, trash talk is often brutal truth because they hurt the most. Also, green panty night? try convincing people that wasn't a scripted line.
 
What do you mean relevant? You literally brought it up. What he did was stoop to Colby's level by breaking out of his ESPN analyst role and trash talk with Colby. Before you say he only spoke the truth, trash talk is often brutal truth because they hurt the most. Also, green panty night? try convincing people that wasn't a scripted line.

Topic: Who Wins In a Face Off: Colby or Jake Paul

My comment: "Colby is a bunch of scripted lines and nothing more.

When he doesn't have those, he just yells like a child. Kind of like when Usman reminded him about breaking his face."


It was an example about Colby's inability to trash talk. I frankly could care less what you or anyone thinks of Usman's trash talk. And it isn't relevant to this thread topic at all.

Have a nice night.
 
100% chance colby calls him Fake Paul
 
Colby and its not even close. Most the stuff that Colby says actually makes sense, is entertaining, and is hilarious, including the nicknames he gives people. The stuff Jake says is just stupid, makes no sense, and is cringey.

No it isn't. That Paul kid being an idiot doesn't make Colby Shakespeare all of a sudden lol
 
Back
Top