Unseen vid Nate vs Nick Diaz

Nate just showing his little brother what's up.
 
Nate looks a lot bigger than Nick in that touchbutt session.
Nate is bigger, it's easy for people to think Nick is because Nate mostly fought at 155 and Nick 170. I ran into them after weigh ins for UFC 118 and he was noticeably bigger, height and frame, and that was in 2010. Nate had also just gotten off the scale 20 minutes prior. I don't think Nick was cutting nearly as much weight as Nate.
 
Nate is bigger, it's easy for people to think Nick is because Nate mostly fought at 155 and Nick 170. I ran into them after weigh ins for UFC 118 and he was noticeably bigger, height and frame, and that was in 2010. Nate had also just gotten off the scale 20 minutes prior. I don't think Nick was cutting nearly as much weight as Nate.


You're really exaggerating. See how perspective messes with scale? In the video Nate is closer to the camera just like in the below photo Nick is closer to the camera.

8d8dcbf06dacab235df1511fa784288e.jpg


It's a lot closer than you make it seem. They're about the same size really.
 
You're really exaggerating. See how perspective messes with scale? In the video Nate is closer to the camera just like in the below photo Nick is closer to the camera.

8d8dcbf06dacab235df1511fa784288e.jpg


It's a lot closer than you make it seem. They're about the same size really.
I get how perspective works. Either way, you're telling me I'm wrong about their sizes based on skewed scales in pictures and videos, whereas I'm basing their size on what I physically saw while talking to them from two feet away. Your argument seems flawed.
 
I get how perspective works. Either way, you're telling me I'm wrong about their sizes based on skewed scales in pictures and videos, whereas I'm basing their size on what I physically saw while talking to them from two feet away. Your argument seems flawed.


No, that's the exact opposite of the reason I posted the photo.

You're exaggerating. People often do this when trying to make a point or when comparing things. You see what you want in order to make your case stronger.

I've met them too and there wasn't that much of a difference. I know you won't believe me which is why I didn't even bother mentioning it in the first place but it is what it is.
 
Guys they are similar sized, depending on the time Your see them.

In-camp Nate will be smaller than out of camp Nick.

out of camp Nate will be similar size to out of camp Nick.
In camp Nick will be smaller looking that out of camp Nate.

overall, Nate is a hair smaller than Nick on average, and if you should also factor in camera angles when judging their sizes
 
I wonder who put a gun to nick's head.
That was the most awkward moment I have ever seen in a sport conference.
 
Nick looks in great shape compared to how he'd looked in recent years. Good to see.
 
No, that's the exact opposite of the reason I posted the photo.

You're exaggerating. People often do this when trying to make a point or when comparing things. You see what you want in order to make your case stronger.

I've met them too and there wasn't that much of a difference. I know you won't believe me which is why I didn't even bother mentioning it in the first place but it is what it is.
It's not that I won't believe you. You're not wrong, people see things differently. I wouldn't have even rebutted your post if I had known you also met them. It seemed like you were saying I was exaggerating simply because you saw pics and videos, without a physical perception of your own. I think Nate looked a little bigger, you think they looked about the same. Potato potahto. I don't see a problem with our opinions of them. Misunderstanding. No harm no foul.
 
Back
Top