- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 11,133
- Reaction score
- 8,852
According to Jan, Glover is a good fight for him on paper while Israel's tricky style, on paper, would likely be more challenging.
What are your opinions?
What are your opinions?
Ok great!
Who am I to disagree with him?Ok great!
True but man do you have to give Glover his due, who thought that guy would be anywhere near the title again after getting finished by Gustafsson and losing to Corey Anderson, I sure as shit didn't.I'll go with the undefeated champion in his prime over a 40 something year old veteran fighter..
This isnt even a debate ( as a disclaimer- the fight still has to be fought and anything can happen).
The people in Nevada have izz as a - 260 favorite over jan while Jan would be a -260 favorite over Glover. Nothing against Glover but hes in a good position because of the state of the current UFC 205 landscape.
People say Glover is too slow every single time. Then he gets on top and turns them into untecognizable carcasses and/or submits 'em.Glover too slow and Jan matches up well with him. Izzy going to be too much for him on the feet.
True but man do you have to give Glover his due, who thought that guy would be anywhere near the title again after getting finished by Gustafsson and losing to Corey Anderson, I sure as shit didn't.
yes, but we should carry on doubting Glover and disregarding his skills until he wins the belt. we shouldn't start giving him props now just in case it interrupts this momentumTrue but man do you have to give Glover his due, who thought that guy would be anywhere near the title again after getting finished by Gustafsson and losing to Corey Anderson, I sure as shit didn't.