- Joined
- Jan 29, 2004
- Messages
- 15,994
- Reaction score
- 6,268
4:16 of video.
He states clearly, "these guys are independent contractors, they can do whatever they want"
Under US labor law in order to retain independent contractor status for the purposes of taxes (amongst other things), an independent contractor HAS to have the ability to work for multiple employers. Co-employment law in the US has really cracked down on this over the last year and a half.
And yet the UFC contract directly contravene this with their exclusivity language.
And yet somehow the UFC has circumvented the changes in the laws. If you are only working for a single employer for an extended period of time, you are by default in the US (laws here in Canada are much laxer) not an independent contractor and cannot claim said status.
There are good reasons for this. The temp staffing industry was part of the reason for the changes. Employers were hiring temps, defining them as independent contractors and then not providing basic benefits, and retaining the right to terminate employment at any time without severance. They would keep these temps on hire indefinitely (often for years) without ever converting them to full time employees because its a lot cheaper to leave them as independent contractors. The US gov't cracked down big time on this and Canada is following suit.
So how the hell is the UFC bypassing this legislation?