Television X-MEN '97 (First Official Trailer, post #292)

SmilinDesperado said:
He should be able to charge his claws. He can charge inorganic matter. Gambit has charged his staff at the tip for targeted smaller explosions so he has control on how much power and where he's focusing the energy.
The action here just seems pretty dumb and useless. The explosion would damage Wolverine's hands still and he'd have to wait for them to heal. I
And him 'riding' Wolverine is a pretty silly image as well.
Click to expand...
That whole sequence was really stupid
 
GearSolidMetal said:
I was thinking about these two quotes and I have a bit of a theory.

The entire season is obviously 100% complete and ready to be streamed, and the Disney Execs finally get around to watching it in its entirety... and its as woke as we fear its going to be.

The Disney Execs now know wokeness is poison to new projects, especially with pre-existing franchises that rely on nostalgia... and they see the X-Men's version of 'The Last Jedi' with this new series.

The Execs order Beau Demayo to cut out EVERYTHING objectionable to longtime fans, even fans that agree with the social messaging don't want it represented in a show that takes place in 1997.Beau Demayo refuses (because he is an activists), is fired (so he won't be showing up to promote the show), and the Execs are ordering the necessary edits to the show, including possibly entire scenes having to be re-animated and voiced.



They'd have 10 days to make the edits for the first 2 episodes, then a week for each episode thereafter.

Perhaps having to re-animate entire scenes is a bit too far, but it'd be interesting if the episodes were a minute shorter than expected, or they have major pacing issues like some parts were heavily edited.
Click to expand...


I wrote this theory knowing the percentages of it being true are pretty low.

But with this headline, I think its chances have improved a bit -

 
GearSolidMetal said:
I wrote this theory knowing the percentages of it being true are pretty low.

But with this headline, I think its chances have improved a bit -

Click to expand...

Ant-Man didn't need 3 movies, even though I enjoyed them all, let alone 4.

Captain Marvel was just boring for the most part.

Eternals was doomed from the start.
 
Batjester said:
Ant-Man didn't need 3 movies, even though I enjoyed them all, let alone 4.

Captain Marvel was just boring for the most part.

Eternals was doomed from the start.
Click to expand...

Ant-Man 3 suffered from the bratty/entitled daughter who was unsufferable. 'Socialism is a charged word, but we could learn some things....'

The Marvels.... was worse than The Flash, and that's saying something.

Eternals.... aug... 'Team Diversity! Equity! & Inclusion!'

Their sequels cancellation means Disney is actually stepping away from social agenda propaganda, and looking toward making profits.

If my theory is correct, and I'm not saying the chances are high, but those same Execs that advised the Disney CEO to cancel those sequels also saw the entirety of the season on X-Men'97, and demanded the showrunner to cut out all the obvious propaganda, and also not include it in the next seasons he was writing. He refused, and was fired, and the edits are being made before the debut on the 20th.

BTW, we'll know for a fact edits have been made if Morph doesn't declare himself as Non-Binary, or whatever After-School-Special way they were planning on delivering that message.
Maybe they were going the obvious way of saying "I'm non-binary." Or maybe they were going the 'I don't know if I'm man, or woman, or both, or neither.'

I got my fingers & adamantium claws crossed for good luck.
 
HenryFlower said:
by all means then, explain what you mean
Click to expand...
There’s really NO need to address any “body image” in these cartoons. These characters and their abilities are what the point is in the X-Men. When you go out of your way to emphasize DEI, or any other woke bullshit you have an agenda. You want to diversify etc you include the characters that are simply in the comic. Prof. X/Magneto-white/“walking disability, Jubilee-brown skinned, The Blob-big bodied, Beast-a blue mutant (for heavens sakes), Storm-black woman, Wolverine-vertically challenged.

From page 20, where I was responding from some original posts of “inclusion” BS. You found a late response or a short response. Now go look up from those earlier posts, you’ll find the full context. SMH
 
Anyone watch it yet? I've seen half of the first episode. It's good, I didn't care for the way Bishop and his guns are drawn but other than that no complaints. I'm glad they have Bishop, I always liked his character. Storm and Cyclops look cool/accurate.
 
CutStryker said:
Not what I was referring to, taking my statement out of context won’t help you, no one will
Click to expand...
Dude just came out of nowhere talking shit to me.......................TO MEEEEEEE. Who the fuck does he think he is oooooooooooo. Imma call my dad and tell him to go beat up his dad.
 
OMG its spose to be out today. Here I come Rogue hope you are as hot as you use to be.
Already downloading Ill watch the first 2 and let my unwoke brothas on here know whats up.
 
Last edited:
CutStryker said:
There’s really NO need to address any “body image” in these cartoons. These characters and their abilities are what the point is in the X-Men. When you go out of your way to emphasize DEI, or any other woke bullshit you have an agenda. You want to diversify etc you include the characters that are simply in the comic. Prof. X/Magneto-white/“walking disability, Jubilee-brown skinned, The Blob-big bodied, Beast-a blue mutant (for heavens sakes), Storm-black woman, Wolverine-vertically challenged.

From page 20, where I was responding from some original posts of “inclusion” BS. You found a late response or a short response. Now go look up from those earlier posts, you’ll find the full context. SMH
Click to expand...
The only people who care about body image are fat.
 
Already got the first 2 episodes Imm throw on my 80s xmen underoos wrap a towel around my neck and go fight crime ooooooooooooo.
 
GearSolidMetal said:
"she continued to say she was trying to achieve “body diversity.’ The show’s director, Jake Castorena, then said the reasoning for this is to “stay relevant.” This sounds a whole lot like the recent woke code to redesign characters “for modern audiences,” which clues us into a lot of activist agenda in television and movies."
Click to expand...

I don't know why but I find this funny. They're copying a cartoon from the 90s, calling it X-Men '97 and then talking about making it relevant for modern audiences. The whole point of it is nostalgia and keeping it as it was in the past.

It's like going to McDonalds, ordering a Big Mac and they give you a grilled chicken salad because they think that's what a modern person at McDonalds really wants.

If they go down that road and the show fails, they'll blame it on there not being an audience but in reality it'll be because they refused to give the audience what they actually want.
 
RoastBeast said:
I don't know why but I find this funny. They're copying a cartoon from the 90s, calling it X-Men '97 and then talking about making it relevant for modern audiences. The whole point of it is nostalgia and keeping it as it was in the past.

It's like going to McDonalds, ordering a Big Mac and they give you a grilled chicken salad because they think that's what a modern person at McDonalds really wants.

If they go down that road and the show fails, they'll blame it on there not being an audience but in reality it'll be because they refused to give the audience what they actually want.
Click to expand...

They're lying.

Its a classic example of saying your reasoning for changing (X) is A, B, & C when the real reasonings is 1, 2, & 3.

Very common with activists within the entertainment industry & marxist politicians.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,238,598
Messages
55,573,562
Members
174,824
Latest member
Wavemeter

Share this page

Back
Top