- Joined
- Jan 9, 2017
- Messages
- 4,977
- Reaction score
- 0
Fedor, JJ, GSP, Anderson, Hughes, BJ, etc...all such masterful fighters. Why do we try so hard to diminish their achievements by obsessing about how they fair in the giant (unprovable) argument of what great fighter is best?
I get the idea of trying to quantify the greatest of all time, but why do we have to tear down fighters, and their fans, in order to make our point?
I am done with trashing the greats (which I'm guilty of in the past) just to give my argument more weight.
I get the idea of trying to quantify the greatest of all time, but why do we have to tear down fighters, and their fans, in order to make our point?
I am done with trashing the greats (which I'm guilty of in the past) just to give my argument more weight.