@dimspace has kept track of the entire USADA/UFC program, not just the postive tests. The link I have for his google doc is an old one though.
lol @ not removing proven innocent jon jones. corrupt organizationand simple list
lol @ not removing proven innocent jon jones. corrupt organization
"On the evidence before the Panel, the Applicant is not a drug cheat," the arbitrators wrote in their epilogue. "He did not know that the tablet he took contained prohibited substances"had Jones been found innocent I would have moved him to the "no fault finding/exonerated/warnings" section
he wasnt, so i didnt
"On the evidence before the Panel, the Applicant is not a drug cheat," the arbitrators wrote in their epilogue. "He did not know that the tablet he took contained prohibited substances"
"On the evidence before the Panel, the Applicant is not a drug cheat," the arbitrators wrote in their epilogue. "He did not know that the tablet he took contained prohibited substances"
13.1. The Panel repeats that the Applicant's fault was at the top end of the scale. In short, the Applicant made an advance enquiry about a product Cialis which he did not take. He made no enquiry at all about the Tadalafil pill which he did take. He simply relied upon his team mate to tell him what it was and how it could enhance sexual pleasure. His degree of fault in fact verged on the reckless. It therefore concludes that the maximum sanction of twelve months subject only to the deduction of the period of suspension served will be consonant with the facts as found. It notes that the maximum penalty for specified substances is half that required by the WADC and cannot be said to infringe any principle of proportionality.
"TADALAFIL 30 MG x 40 23 This Product is for CHEMICAL RESEARCH USE ONLY. NOT INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION/USE. WARNING: If product is ingested accidently contact Poison Control. (…) This product is not a drug, food, or cosmetic and should not be misbranded, misused or mislabelled (sic) as a drug, food or cosmetic. (…)"
i literally just copy pasted from the actual verdict itself clearing him of all cheating and you refuse to remove him? no bias there at allhe was banned for a year.. he is serving a suspension
i list people based on actual factual accuracy, not on who i think should be on which list.
anyway, im sure theres plenty of threads about it for you to go cry in
UFC can't give penalties.It's a disgrace that UFC hasn't introduced a lifetime ban for cheating
he was banned for a year.. he is serving a suspension
i list people based on actual factual accuracy, not on who i think should be on which list.
anyway, im sure theres plenty of threads about it for you to go cry in
i literally just copy pasted from the actual verdict itself clearing him of all cheating and you refuse to remove him? no bias there at all
It said he wasn't a drug cheat, it didn't say he didn't deserve a suspension, or that he didn't violate the ADP. He did, and got the maximum suspension under the policy for what he took.i literally just copy pasted from the actual verdict itself clearing him of all cheating and you refuse to remove him? no bias there at all
It's fact from the hearing there pal!