One reviewer i watched briefly touched on it. Said the 0.03ms response time doesnt require something like Dyac. While only taking a picture of the alien test. Looked great but they didnt do anything in-depth.
I suspect you're talking about Optimum. He's hands down the best reviewer for guys who want the lowdown on competitive monitors. For the moment, as an ultimate benchmark to assess everything at once, nobody has really offered a better methodology than that. He simply applies the Blurbuster alien ship test substituting
Overwatch 2. NVIDIA's ULMB 2 has usurped DyAc+ as the preeminent backlight strobing technology. I'm not 100% up to date on this, but AFAIK, those are still the only two that aren't pointless due to crippled brightness.
But just six days ago he reviewed the other 360Hz OLED monitor that recently dropped,
by MSI, the direct competitor to the Alienware I highlighted, with nearly
identical specs, and in that video he mentions he's sticking with the 540Hz TN panel in his own setup. Even with the added image stabilization of ULMB, and the near-instantaneous response times of OLED which easily keep up with a 360Hz output, apparently he still thinks the 540Hz display is just a bit smoother. The downside is
that display is only offered at 24.1". Ick.
Notice he lists his current eSports monitor recommendations in every YouTube video he uploads-- keeping them current:
He mentions using a YouTube comment for that video that both LG and ASUS have 480Hz OLED monitors on the horizon. It sounds like he believes once those drop he'll be switching.
But I didn't opine the AW2725DF was necessarily the best competitive monitor. Although it's in the running, obviously. It's the best overall gaming monitor. Between the size, resolution, contrast, color depth/gamut, and motion performance...there's nothing better.
