And look what the Republicans are doing to UkraineThe soviets supplied the majority of the bodies.
Would have been impossible/useless without US supplies.
Without the soviets the loss of life for the western allies would be many times greater.
Europeans are racist and think Japan was inconsequential to the warWhat the US did in the Pacific is probably a bigger contribution to winning the war.
Especially combat wise
It was.
Some Europeans don't like to admit it (LOL at that - are they embarrassed they got bailed out, or just jealous?).
The US was absolutely key to the Allied victory. The US obviously didn't do it alone though - but saying that the US's involvement didn't make a difference is just being delusional.
Lol, what a shit post. The servicemen in the Pacific did "fuck all?" Fuck offAmericans surrendered or went awol in numbers that were unheard of, cowards is a term used, the fighting that they confronted when they arrived was overwhelming for them, they were considered liabilities on the battlefield and no one wanted to fight along side them, what they did have was freshness, the war had taken its toll and they came and did fuck all but it was some comfort for the hardened soldiers that they would have support, the fact that America never went into Berlin first is everything you need to know about them, In fact every conflict since has been an embarrassment, they have all the bells and whistles but inferior soldiers
Yea pretty much this, and supplying Britain, if Americans did not take part in the fighting, Germany would have isolated Britain and concentrated on defeating stalin, fuck knows what would have happened in the Pacific theatre.Let's start here.
"$11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today's currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945"
Pacific lol you sat on a boat in the middle of fucking no where bombing the fuck out of an island and then struggled taking it, meanwhile the allies were on the ground in the trenches doing the real shit, go and watch your one sided fantasy war movies, your clueless, lmfao the pacific good oneLol, what a shit post. The servicemen in the Pacific did "fuck all?" Fuck off
I'm very much aware of the Russians' achievements and sacrifices in the war but to say American surrender numbers were "unheard of" after Russian surrender numbers totaled roughly 3.5 million in 1941-42 is laughable.
But the question in the OP is not did they make a difference; rather it's whether they made the difference. Just sayin'.It was.
Some Europeans don't like to admit it (LOL at that - are they embarrassed they got bailed out, or just jealous?).
The US was absolutely key to the Allied victory. The US obviously didn't do it alone though - but saying that the US's involvement didn't make a difference is just being delusional.
I hope you're just trolling.Pacific lol you sat on a boat in the middle of fucking no where bombing the fuck out of an island and then struggled taking it, meanwhile the allies were on the ground in the trenches doing the real shit, go and watch your one sided fantasy war movies, your clueless, lmfao the pacific good one
Germany literally declared war against the US when it had no obligation to do so.
This is fundamentally inaccurate. There is no scenario where Germany is able to knock Britain out of the war militarily or politically. They failed to even attack most convoys making it to the UK, and they never had close to the capabilities to invade the UK.
Just to make this very clear. 90 percent of convoys to the UK were never attacked, and over all less than 1 percent of merchants to the UK were sunk.
How exactly do you think an invasion of the British isles would have unfolded?
Why would the US have stopped sending shipping to a country? Unrestricted submarine warfare is very illegal.
People really need to understand that no amount of more submarine building was going to win the Battle of the Atlantic. Literally 90 percent of German submariners were killed or captured during the war.
What did the leader of the Soviet party say about this issue?
"The United States is a country of machines. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war." -Stalin.
Over 180 billion dollars in today's value. Over ten thousand planes, over six thousands tanks, over 300,000 trucks and other vehicles, plus food and agricultural assistance during some of the harshest winters of fighting.
You're welcome.
I see it all the time on the internet. It’s even in this thread coming from multiple posters. I think it’s because America is just not very popular these days and this is how they cope. It always boils down to the fact that a lot more Soviets died.I rarely see anyone try to make a different take on why the Allies won with the goal to downplay the US.
I see it all the time on the internet. It’s even in this thread coming from multiple posters. I think it’s because America is just not very popular these days and this is how they cope. It always boils down to the fact that a lot more Soviets died.
But this argument always comes back to those two [U.S.A. and Soviet Union] which in turn informs the focus here, and it really is true that the Soviet Union and the USA in turn created a very well matched pair of complementary partners, the former with the manpower, and most importantly the willpower to use it, and the latter with the massive industrial, agricultural, and logistical capacity to keep not only herself, but also her Allies, going. It is hard to imagine an American people with the fortitude to accept the level of losses the USSR suffered, just as it is hard to believe that a Soviet military would achieve anywhere close to the level of operational capabilities it did without American support.
I think americans are too cocky dreamers. They are thinking that invalide FDL ghost and Churchill were great businessmans.I rarely see anyone try to make a different take on why the Allies won with the goal to downplay the US. It just doesn't make much sense for Europeans to do that when it largely means to prop up the Soviet Union/Russia more, which pretty much everyone thinks far lesser of than the US. On the contrary I much more often see Americans be upset that someone says they didn't just win the war because they take pride in it for some reason.
There's just no real reason to take pride, or feel embarrassment, about this for anyone here since none of us were there to fight. One really has to have no personal achievements to speak of if one has to hang one's pride on such things, although I guess that isn't all that uncommon.
You are sts because all white " americans " are european colonisators offsprings cos bloodline genetically and there isn't nation genetically called american. Never will be and nothing wrong here....Europeans are racist and think Japan was inconsequential to the war