- Joined
- Jul 2, 2020
- Messages
- 8,289
- Reaction score
- 12,757
I couldn’t tell you a thing he did, but I do remember that I actually truly disliked him. Him and computer fogie are one of the few people on here that I really didn’t like.Nostromo bless
I couldn’t tell you a thing he did, but I do remember that I actually truly disliked him. Him and computer fogie are one of the few people on here that I really didn’t like.Nostromo bless
He banned a lot of peeps and was pretty brutal even to interact with in PMs. I remember when football came up in the OT and he was warning folks about talking sports in that subforum... just over the top stuff.I couldn’t tell you a thing he did, but I do remember that I actually truly disliked him. Him and computer fogie are one of the few people on here that I really didn’t like.
Apparently they recruited only male bottoms for this particular study. InterestingDiscovered by scientists at Procter & Gamble in the 1960s, Olestra was a fat substitute that wasn't absorbed in the body. Tested in cakes, doughnuts and ice cream, it reduced calorie count by up to 50%.
It seemed like a breakthrough for dieters, but the feedback on Olestra's subsequent trials was disastrous – and rather revolting. "They were all the same complaint," explains food scientist Peter Berry Ottaway, "anal leaking coming out of the rectum without any control."
As opposed to anal leaking coming out of the ears.anal leaking coming out of the rectum
I haven't seen one one these in about 30-40 years.Lemme tell ya, I was relieved when my father brought home one of these,
Edit: I mean literally, I was relieved, as in off duty. And thank God for that.
That was the shit back then, and it couldn't turn the tv on or off, no volume control either, just changed channels.I don't even remember anything like that. I'm 50 how old are you guys?
Dude, what do you think that dial on the right is for?I haven't seen one one these in about 30-40 years.
That was the shit back then, and it couldn't turn the tv on or off, no volume control either, just changed channels.
The dial was for tuning the channel in if there was interference/lines, the switch on the left was for switching from the top row of buttons to the bottom row. There was no on/off or volume, you still had to walk up to the tv for that.Dude, what do you think that dial on the right is for?
That sounds better than having to stand there holding the antenna so your dad could watch tv because the static would come back once you let it go.The dial was for tuning the channel in if there was interference/lines, the switch on the left was for switching from the top row of buttons to the bottom row. There was no on/off or volume, you still had to walk up to the tv for that.
Remember all the tin foil wrapped around the antennae? For some reason that never did as well as well as a child standing there holding them...That sounds better than having to stand there holding the antenna so your dad could watch tv because the static would come back once you let it go.
I may have mis-remembered, so ok, fair enough. It was a little while ago lolThe dial was for tuning the channel in if there was interference/lines, the switch on the left was for switching from the top row of buttons to the bottom row. There was no on/off or volume, you still had to walk up to the tv for that.
Well, that's just because a person, even a child, is a much bigger antenna than some foil.Remember all the tin foil wrapped around the antennae? For some reason that never did as well as well as a child standing there holding them...
Old as fuck. That's why they are so cranky yelling at the clouds.How old are y’all that you watched the odd couple, mash in their original runs and had antenna tvs?
Get off our lawn bubOld as fuck. That's why they are so cranky yelling at the clouds.
Old as fuck. That's why they are so cranky yelling at the clouds.
Right here. There was a chance of hitting 38k before the run up. I will be the first to admit that I did not believe we would retract lower than 44k. 38k was the next level of resistance though so likely we hold here.@Rob Battisti what are you thinking on where bitcoin will bottom out here before the price bumps back up before the halving?
I think it will dip below 35k for sure. Before the halving I think it will climb to about 40k then drip below 35k again. The one thing I have been saying is to sell before the drips then buy back into make money. If you had multiple bitcoins selling at that 46k mark would have netted you pretty good profit to buy back in.Right here. There was a chance of hitting 38k before the run up. I will be the first to admit that I did not believe we would retract lower than 44k. 38k was the next level of resistance though so likely we hold here.
I’m still a buyer and this does nothing to shake my confidence in 125-150k BTC this cycle.
Based on what?I think it will dip below 35k for sure. Before the halving I think it will climb to about 40k then drip below 35k again. The one thing I have been saying is to sell before the drips then buy back into make money. If you had multiple bitcoins selling at that 46k mark would have netted you pretty good profit to buy back in.