Several people in this thread have said that her story is definitely false. I don't have any issue with people believing it's false, it very well may be false for all we know. I just have an issue with people attacking the woman's character, calling her a liar, saying she's somehow a political operative of sorts, etc. It all seems like an incredibly harsh judgement on somebody who, for all we know, is being completely honest.
I think that some of the judgements have left a bad taste in my mouth because of how unlikely they seem to be to me. For example,
In a way it is, but it's not disproving anything, or even directly contradicting what she said. They are just saying they don't remember, not that she was not attacked.
Contradicting would be, "Yeah, I remember that night, and I was with her the whole time and nothing like that happened." But simply not remembering being at a party, or being around certain people, is not really substantial evidence to me at all. Like I said, there are very few parties that I've ever been to that I could remember details like that about.
I haven't seen a transcript of this part. I'm not saying that is not being reported, I'm just saying I read a few things and did not see it yet. I agree that if she's claiming there were only a few people there, and listing the specific people, it is more difficult to believe her recollection of the events is true.
If that's the case, then I'd say that I have a really hard time understanding how her version of the events was accurate. I still don't actually know anything though.