What word games? Your own source said what I said in no uncertain terms. I quoted directly from it FFS. If that statement is contradicted by the article itself that doesn't do much for its credibility either, does it? Turn that back on the government all you like. Press them to release more details if you please, but as it stands, the government is under no onus to produce the evidence upon which their conclusions are based, and further, from the article, Obama himself said, "“The conclusions of the intelligence community with respect to the Russian hacking,” the legacy-minded Obama said, “were not conclusive.”" The article is an exercise in speculation and I don't believe it purports to be otherwise. More than once they state they are mainly trying to provoke debate, not provide a decisive conclusion. How do you address the fact that VIPS itself is divided on the matter? Edit: Seriously, if this were many other posters on here I'd swear I was being trolled. What's your deal?