Where does that put him all time in WW.. I think that puts him past lawler and Hughes. Or are we racist to think otherwise
Hughes has accomplished far more then Woodley at this point. 7 title defences and was as dominant as they come against verry good competition.
Since winning his title Woodley looked mediocre at best. yes he won 2 of his titledefences ( one draw which says enough ) but you surely cant claim he looked like a dominant champion.
Hughes was the best ww of his time. Currently not so sure about Woodley tho. I consider Rory the better fighter.
beating Till shouldnt elevate his status imo
he looked like sh*t against Maia just like Maia looked like sh*t against Woodley. Against Thompson he looked hesitant to pull the trigger aswell hence the first fight being a draw and the second fight him not showing us a dominant performance. Every time he did pull the trigger however Wonderboy was on his butt.He absolutely looked like a dominant champion against Maia and was clearly the better fighter in both of the Thompson matches. They were boring matches, but it's not pretend they stood a chance of beating him.
Problem is that WW is no longer the division it used to be, and there is no more Rory/Hendricks for Woodley to beat. Till, Colby and Usman are potatoes in comparison. So unless he moves to MW and beats Whittaker I am not sure Woodley can do anything to top his win vs Lawler.