Oh look, the usual suspects shitposting again.. ^
Like clockwork..
(five in a row, impressive)
Pointing out facts is for C U C K SThe "I didn't see coverage so it must not have been covered" angle is absurd. You didn't hear anything about it because you had your head in the sand. Every major news outlet ran stories on this, many of them front page.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/27/politics/gallery/march-for-life-2017/
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/dc-s-march-life-highlight-gains-abortion-opponents-n712906
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...3c4b4fb5a63_story.html?utm_term=.71a53cc35789
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/us/politics/anti-abortion-march-for-life.html?_r=0
http://www.npr.org/2017/01/28/51207...t-not-necessarily-pro-trump-at-march-for-life
https://www.yahoo.com/news/at-march-for-life-varying-views-on-what-pro-life-means-230503236.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/doubl...mood_at_the_anti_abortion_march_for_life.html
This is the kind of shitposting that belongs in the dump.
Looking forward to @Peteyandjia aborting his claim and realizing he made it because of his own freedom of choice.
Wow, liberal media at it again.
the mainstream media's job is to convince, not to inform
it doesnt fit what the narrative theyre trying to create, so they wont tell you
Did Pence speak? I thought I read something about he was supposed to be there.Actually Madonna was there & gave a big speech in support, where she talked about how much she wanted to blow up abortion clinics.
no, its to entertain so that they can make more ad revenue.
how does for-profit news entertain? tell people what they want to hear. fake outrage. real outrage. sex. violence.
both right and left wing consumers are represented, regardless of what anyone claims. its just capitalism, and all will be marketed to.
Were there speeches about tampons and vaginas? If not, how is this news? Madonna wasn't even there FFS.
Being pro-life is easy, you don't have to deal with the ugly complexities of life. Killing babies will always be an ugly subject, and that doesn't mean it shouldn't always be available.
The "I didn't see coverage so it must not have been covered" angle is absurd. You didn't hear anything about it because you had your head in the sand. Every major news outlet ran stories on this, many of them front page.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/27/politics/gallery/march-for-life-2017/
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/dc-s-march-life-highlight-gains-abortion-opponents-n712906
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...3c4b4fb5a63_story.html?utm_term=.71a53cc35789
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/us/politics/anti-abortion-march-for-life.html?_r=0
http://www.npr.org/2017/01/28/51207...t-not-necessarily-pro-trump-at-march-for-life
https://www.yahoo.com/news/at-march-for-life-varying-views-on-what-pro-life-means-230503236.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/doubl...mood_at_the_anti_abortion_march_for_life.html
This is the kind of shitposting that belongs in the dump.
Check out post #33Is it the liberal media?
Was fox news, and the Washington post running hot with this, like the MSM was running with the women's march?
Did Pence speak? I thought I read something about he was supposed to be there.
Please tell me he's Biden like.
Hundreds of thousands of people apparently marched on the capitol yesterday to protest abortion... but I didn't hear anything about it until my friend mentioned it to me today. The 'Women's March' last week was absolutely inescapable on every news outlet, but I didn't see much of a peep for this one. How about you guys?