We have to face reality. Ukraine will not be given enough to reclaim their territory, let alone all of Crimea.
That's true but still not main point
Crimea and east likely are gone, position to reach is have rest of Ukraine under real NATO's protection, because seems clear war done with simple western support can't stop Putin but just slow him down
This is nothing new. UKR will not likely gain back any territory via ground battles. The question is how long can Russia fund and supply zombies for the special military operation going forward with no end in sight.
The problem (well, one of problems) to me seems Russia's superior ability at buil up defense in conquered territories
Probably longer than Ukraine will get supplies from the West.
To Putin, this is existential. To the West, this is about money and politics. Putin is willing to bankrupt Russia to win.
That's the problem with western support, it's like west wish was possible keep going 50% (while attempting to please all internal bullshit) at it and win, while at this point should be clear it's not going to happen and we even get outraged at daily predictable outcome (helping the argument of pieces of shit that wish we abandon/betray Ukraine)
Seems like our support still is proportionate to that "at some point russians will end energies/weapons and our half ass help will be enough to allow ukranian meat to win", problem with this is that will work if ukranians had strong safer defense positions and russia was daily destroying itself attacking, but we know in reality Ukraine forces are getting deteriorated at least as fast as russian's
May even be true that west may keep pump there money/toys till an "advantage", but on human side they're not sending there fresh new soldiers while russian storage of new bodies seems still immense
Someone really is thinking that West or East wants Ukr to win? Actions already had answer for really thinking ppl.
And no, it isn't just about money or loud politics talks.
Yes, uncle Putin is allowed to brainwash his population with propaganda talks that russia is in danger and these ants are fighting vs NATO and collective west etc bullshit , including fairy tales about proxy war ( unfortunately for ukr it isn't proxy war at all otherwise they had been supplied more generously and damn considerably faster without long talks ).
However yup, a lot of things are done IMHO cos money. For europe cheaper is to pump some money in rather than to see Ukraine and Moldova 404 and xx xxx xxx xxx more refugees they never will get to rid off ....
And yes, for U.S this too is very important because europe is largest trade partner for them and also very important investments object etc stuff...More than maga fans are dreaming about. U.S too does have euro investments , businesses etc stuff ....
I think you're overestimating "Team West" ability to work functionally picking our most desireable outcome
EU is a farce composed of lot different interests
USA situation is a mess where the mummy vs traitor cunt contest seems more important
To begin with good luck at make everybody agree on wich is our most desireable outcome to begin with, let alone run a straight line to reach it
China IMHO does care not to allow Russia easily to win and not to loss completely. Main task is to weaken Russia demographically and financially as much as it will be possible in order to get more impact in Russia and to achieve deRusification of Siberia for a reason. Literally slowly turn Siberia into Chinatown without direct war...m
This for China is not best scenario (would have preferred Russia not doing any of this Ukraine invasion shit) but indeed best scenario given current cards
For the west is some sort of "bright side" of a situation that overall is shaping up as a defeat
And i'm not even talking about Ukraine itself
To me it is, but some would say Finland and Sweden joining NATO compensate
But most big shit is realize (very predictable, but different see it happen) how our model of power is too complex to move fast and hard, and this risk in long run to result into many many "small defeats" that can be played down by our leaders as long one does'nt consider all these as a whole huge problem
All this while would have been much better find a fast solution (sound simplistic but it is what it is) to take a strong defensive stance, because in upcoming years we have worse problems that have nothing to do with Putin (but that Putin can and will make worse, see his presence in Africa)
West is obtusely sticking to the sinking boat of peace-time "values" and attitude, while world is changing fast