- Joined
- Jun 6, 2010
- Messages
- 46,859
- Reaction score
- 29,164
Hello, Earth here. Condit won. Most of us on Earth have known that for nearly 15 years now.On paper. Not in the eyes of the citizens of Earth.
Hello, Earth here. Condit won. Most of us on Earth have known that for nearly 15 years now.On paper. Not in the eyes of the citizens of Earth.
I scored it for Condit too, but this decision was necessary because Nick Diaz should have won 1,2 and 5.
Wah. Condit won the fight by being better. Diaz's inability to make people fight his one single style is a bore and his own faultOn paper. Not in the eyes of the citizens of Earth.
That's a whole bunch of words saying you have no clue about the history of the sport or the honesty and integrity necessary to become someone worthwhile. Your bullshido is bullshit-o.
Nice scoring.
Wah. Condit won the fight by being better. Diaz's inability to make people fight his one single style is a bore and his own fault
People failing to see Condits attempts has always been mind-blowing to me. He DID try to make it exciting, just after making sure he was ahead first every time. Why that upsets people, that he didn't sacrifice winning to be exciting, is honestly indicative of how much of a baby back bitch people like you should be seen as
Carlos would be doing better today where damage is counted more than lay and pray (sometimes).Condit wasn't a power puncher but finishing ability wasn't his weakness—leading up to the Lawler fight, he won 30 out of his 32 wins by stoppage giving him one of the highest finish rates in the UFC.
Condit's weakness was his lack of takedown defense. He was trained with the mindset that a good bottom game can replace takedown defense (the Diaz mindset as well) which worked for awhile but was outdated by the time he entered the UFC. He had a good get up game and could do real damage from bottom position but it wasn't enough against guys like Hendricks and GSP.
There's more integrity in the wad of tissue paper I've just cleaned my cock off with than @JakePaulMMAThat's a whole bunch of words saying you have no clue about the history of the sport or the honesty and integrity necessary to become someone worthwhile. Your bullshido is bullshit-o.
You're shook, boy. Ain't no such thing as half-way crooks.®There's more integrity in the wad of tissue paper I've just cleaned my cock off with than @JakePaulMMA
You're a joke account and/or a joke person. I put no thought into replying to you.You're shook, boy. Ain't no such thing as half-way crooks.®
Your words, not mine. I wouldn't expect any less from some forum troll like yourself.I put no thought into replying.