Your question was stupid and didn't understand what's really going on in the world.
It's a philosophical question. The world's current state has nothing to do with the actual question. Your reluctance to answer is odd
Nah.
Progress is progress.
Its like asking how far back in time do we have to travel to make conservatives happy?
There is no answer.
My reluctance to treat your incorrect assumption as though it is correct is odd to you?
What assumption did i make that was wrong?
Well, several, but that's because your foundation assumption was wrong. That's the one I emboldened and already explained.
Well conservative doesn't imply no change at all so I'm not sure you have a point.
Progress is progress? What does that mean? Do you agree with EVERY aspect of the progressive movement and will always do so?
Continuously re-evaluate the principles I stand by while studying the arguments that claim I'm wrong in an attempt to converge upon an even better set of principles and positions. Meanwhile, continue to uphold science and reason as the primary drivers of human progress.
Good post but really thats just rational/critical thinking. Shouldn't be so rare.
I've never considered myself a progressive but in US politics I would probably be called a progressive. I and the mainstream left mainly want to progress towards universal health care and sensible policy that attempts to progress on our ability to combat global warming.At some point when enough changes are made you will find yourself happy with the way things are. Others will be yet more progressive and begin to call you regressive for wanting to slow "progress".
One may have a progressive viewpoint currently, but aren't you at odds with yourself eventually? Is this why people become more conservative generally as they get older?
Question: What do you do when you no longer believe in the "progress"?
Not sure what you're getting at here. Is your meaning that progressivism has no particular claim to critical thinking, and that supporting critical thinking does not imply progressivism?
No particular claim
Helping others isn't always right.
You didn't really answer the question. Do you stop identifying as progressive when the movement goes past what you are comfortable with? Are you considered regressive at that point?
I agree with that. In general, I think that principles exist on their own, and that movements and ideologies can only subscribe to them and not adopt them and thereby own them to the exclusion of others.
Most progressives want to make changes to benefit other people instead of themselves. This is the difference between progressives and conservatives enacting social change.
Most progressives want to make changes to benefit other people instead of themselves. This is the difference between progressives and conservatives enacting social change.