- Joined
- Dec 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,473
- Reaction score
- 66
My point wasn't that general strength can't be better measured through compound lifts than it can technical applications like suplexing someone. My point was that if what you're interested in is suplexing people, it's not wrong to talk about someone being stronger with respect to that activity than someone else with less skill at suplexing people but better weight room numbers. Which is what I think @Daniel Fox was talking about, and which we've all experienced if we've been grappling a while. Part of it is just pure technique, but part of it is also actual strength built through repetition as the motions of grappling are very, very different from the motions of powerlifting and build a very different type of muscular strength. For example, how much rotational strength is involved in any of the power lifts? Not really much of any IMO. Are the hips and abs made strong from powerlifting? Yes, of course, but the CNS adaptations which as you probably know account for a significant amount of demonstrable strrength are not going to be there the same way they are for a Judoka who has been twisting people over his hips for years. Big compound lifts are the best way to develop general strength, especially in the prime movers, but the ability to apply strength is limited by the weakest link and if that link is something you don't really train in the weight room but train on the mat all the time it's entirely possible for someone with somewhat lower lifting numbers to actually be stronger in grappling movements.
Agree 100%