- Joined
- Feb 22, 2005
- Messages
- 48,474
- Reaction score
- 15,075
Aren't your lead hand and center line always "related" ?
Define "related."
Aren't your lead hand and center line always "related" ?
Here's the thing about that clip, Gonzalez' opponent had a correct angle, but never really the correct distance. And it's through a key deception in blending the two. I don't know if this will make sense in type but it's something Dadi and I went over in person:
If my lead hand is the threat to you, you CANNOT move around the hand itself. For instance, if I pull a knife on a guy and he would like to try and defend himself, he can't move around the knife. Especially if say, I have another knife. If he focuses on one, the lead one, he'll get stabbed by the other one. But by focus I mean make it his pivot point. If he is to attack or defend, he has to maintain positioning at my center line. Think BEYOND the knife. Now take a look at that gif again. Gonzalez begins to prod at the opponent with the left hand, and he does so very well. His positioning is still fairly solid even with the head forward as his head doesn't go beyond the lead foot, but you're right in perceiving that he is weak to his own left side. BUT, the opponent isn't pivoting around Gonzalez center-line, once that lead hand threatens, he's trying to pivot around the hand. Dadi would say: "If you get a guy moving around your hand, he's done. He won't see any other attack coming." And then BLAMMO, right hand and it's as if the guy had no clue it was coming, and he was facing the right direction, but at the wrong turning point.
That's some deeply insightful stuff. Thank you. It makes a lot of sense now, I can picture a bunch of big punches that have landed as the guy walked into them while looking at and trying to move around the other hand. Awesome.
What does one mean by, "moving around the hand" in boxing terms here? I just don't understand.
Define "related."
Looks like this answers my question - " It seems to be because the trajectory of the hand can change very easily, so that changing your angle relative to one can put you into the path of the other, or make you susceptible to a circular punch. Whereas pivoting away from the opponent's center line will create a bit more distance between yourself and the hand you feel threatened by."
Is that ^ what you meant initially ?
If yes - how exactly do you distinguish between where the real centerline is and the direction of the lead hand ? Lead hand may block your vision, also it threatens you - so natural assumption during the sparring would be that this is where the centerline.
Looks like this answers my question - " It seems to be because the trajectory of the hand can change very easily, so that changing your angle relative to one can put you into the path of the other, or make you susceptible to a circular punch. Whereas pivoting away from the opponent's center line will create a bit more distance between yourself and the hand you feel threatened by."
Is that ^ what you meant initially ?
If yes - how exactly do you distinguish between where the real centerline is and the direction of the lead hand ? Lead hand may block your vision, also it threatens you - so natural assumption during the sparring would be that this is where the centerline.
The center line is just the center line. No extra indicators required. Draw a line from the guy's throat to his crotch.
On a standing opponent it is clear.
But ,say, your opponent moves/pivots while sticking his lead into your face etc - then to correctly face the opponents' centerline looks not so easy. I actually think no easy way to solve that ... Do I miss something ?
His center line doesn't have to be exposed for you to be facing it. For example this is facing the center line . . .
. . . but so is this:
How do you know what to face in a dynamic fight ? That's my question ...
Because, against quality opponent it looks not easy and more so I believe there is no good solution for that. May be just some things that may help.
but the lead hand isn't the same as the centerline. When their lead hand is threatening you enough to cause you to lose sight of their center
That is exactly my question - any known approaches to locate\continue to face that center and not to confuse it with opponent's lead hand direction ?
That is exactly my question - any known approaches to locate\continue to face that center and not to confuse it with opponent's lead hand direction ?
It's just a lapse of judgment that happens, as boris has stated, in a dynamic fight. In the gif Connor posted, Gonzalez isn't starching a shitty fighter. What he did was trick a good fighter into moving AROUND his left hand to get away from it, instead of around is body to keep all of his defensive integrity. Like Connor suggested, if he'd have moved relative to Gonzalez' body, cut a tighter angle and in a more stable position (feet in position, weight low), he'd have actually had EVERY advantage on Gonzalez and might have gotten a knockdown himself. But his movement is in relation only to the threat of the left, thus, he moved into the correct distance TO be hit very hard by the right.
My girl does that to the other girl in the above sparring a couple of times, albeit accidentally, and due to her being educated on not losing track easily, she's in good positions to take advantage of it.
The notion is, no matter where or how he moves, she tracks his center line by pointing her lead toe at it, even after defending herself, she always RE-threatens him.
I like the drill. But I wonder what happens, when opponent is just blocking your vision with his lead hand. How do you know where to point your toe then ?
My feeling, is that no easy solution exists for that and you basically have to deal with that lead. Otherwise you are f...cked. Am I correct ?