You can't do "nothing" that's not allowed, you have to be active and trust me fighters would try to take their heads off because holding and takedown won't mean shit!So when two fighters do nothing for 4 rounds and wait for the last round before doing something, like Woodley vs Thompson 2, that's considered more entertaining to you?
Yes. If he manages to win the final round after taking a beating for two rounds he deserves the victory. Exactly this.So that if fighter A beats the crap out of fighter B for 2 rounds but fighter B slighly wins round 3 he wins the fight?
and idealy there should be 5 or even 7 judges scoring that last round.
That would change up the game and fights would be more entertaining and easier and less controversial to score if it goes to a decision