Masvidal catching heat for pointing gun at cameraman and pulling the trigger

Status
Not open for further replies.
Betas are offended and want Jorge canceled
https://www.mmamania.com/2023/4/4/2...cameraman-failed-attempt-emulate-scarface-mma
View attachment 977179
scarface-tommy-gun.gif

Jorge-Masvidal.png

Any RESPONSIBLE gun owner will tell you that you must treat every weapon as if it's loaded.

What Jorge did was very dangerous
 
I mean it kinda does. Big difference between a loaded gun and a non loaded gun.
That gun may very well be hot, just because the magazine is not in it does not mean there is not still a round in the chamber. Having said that, it's possible the camera was on a stick or something and nobody was directly behind it.
 
Do you know that a bunch of people have been killed because they thought a gun was unloaded? It doesn't matter if it's loaded or not loaded, you don't point a gun at something or someone you aren't willing to shoot.
You are trying to reason with an idiot. At this point in the thread, all we can do is laugh at them and feel sorry for them.
 
Jorge and an expert likely checked the gun completely for ammo.

Nothing in clip or no clip. And nothing in barrel.

Jorge's not a moron like Alec Baldwin.
 
It's not a matter of debating skill. There's wisdom in not investing energy to debate people who go out of their way to cry about every little thing.

Saying what's true doesn't mean I'm crying. It just means some of you kids are soft as hell and need to touch grass. Or lift some weights or something. Estrogen just beams off some of these posts.

Permission was most likely asked prior to doing it. It fits the image he's trying to sell / sells the fight. So they okayed it.

The UFC and it's production team is NOT run by meat heads. Everything they put out is calculated.

Again, some people just want to go on some wild witch hunt over every little thing. It's embarrassing.

About the N word, those were different times. For the last few decades, it was just another way of saying home boy. It was never racist. It was the hard "er" that was racist. Which nobody touched. Only recently did that change and they were used interchangeably, when that was never the case in the past.
A new contender in the "who is the dumbest in the thread" contest emerges. Poll please.
 
That gun may very well be hot, just because the magazine is not in it does not mean there is not still a round in the chamber. Having said that, it's possible the camera was on a stick or something and nobody was directly behind it.

Exactly.

Probably wasn't even anyone behind the camera.
 
That gun may very well be hot, just because the magazine is not in it does not mean there is not still a round in the chamber. Having said that, it's possible the camera was on a stick or something and nobody was directly behind it.

While it's possible that the camera was on a harness or some kind of device that meant no one was behind it. It's very VERY likely not the case. Couple reasons. 1. The rig you need to remotely operate a camera remotely is huge. You can't just have a camera "On a stick", the operator needs full control. Not just the direction it is pointed - but the zoom, focus, filters and various sound settings. These are done on the spin. If you are going to do that remotely, you need a lot of space and the shot needs to be planned and mapped out. I wasn't there, and could be mistaken. If he had specifically that shot planned and mapped that one and left the other ones to be shot as normal ... Just seems like a pointless amount of effort to go to for one shot. Plus he was talking to the camera man at the time as well....

Simply put. I don't buy that it was "on a stick". 96% sure that there was a guy holding that camera at that time.
 
Jorge needs to realize he is not scarface.

This dummy really needs to grow up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top