Liberals Exposing Their Hate For The Constitution And The Amendment Process

TheStruggle said:
Democrats are attacking Supreme Court pick Neil Gorsuch for being a "originalist", basically saying that he doesn't use emotions, or feelings, or judging fair and unfair when making his decision as a Judge in the USA, he only cites the Constitution and the way it was written.

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has made it her mission to kill Judge Neil Gorsuch’s nomination for the Supreme Court but so far she’s doing a very poor job of it. Judge Gorsuch’s job isn’t to “fight” for anyone, he’s supposed to be upholding our laws. The law doesn’t play favorites, the law simply is, and a judge’s job is simply to determine how to best uphold the law in each case.

"This is personal, but I find this originalist judicial philosophy to be really troubling," Feinstein said Monday. "I firmly believe the American Constitution is a living document intended to evolve as our country evolves," pointing out that under originalism, schools would still be segregated and women would not be allowed to vote.


Here's what Democrats fail to understand about our Constitution, we have a process called "the amendment process" meaning if you feel something is wrong or something that the federal government needs to address, then you must get 2/3 of the house, 2/3 of the Senate, and 3/4 of the US States to agree with your logic and add it to the Constitution. This is what happened with Slavery and women's right to vote. It was amended in the Constitution and turned into law. but what Democrats don't like, is that as written, the Constitution does NOT gave them the right to do whatever the hell they like especially things that was not a given right to the Federal Government like healthcare, education, and gay marriage. So now Democrats want you to believe, any who follows the words of the Constitution as they are written is a bad person because...civil rights, LGBTQI, or something.


But Feinstein's exchange with Gorsuch is exposing the true views of democratic party on how they view, the Constitution, the history, and law process of our country.
Click to expand...
Hypocritical sandwich. They are honestly running out of libtard bull and have nothing left but the cold hard truth staring them down.

Popcorn time.
 
I think the fact that the guy who pushed the RFRA claimed that the bill was never supposed to apply to non-profit corporations is proof enough that the decision was not originalist.
 
Mad child said:
Hypocritical sandwich. They are honestly running out of libtard bull and have nothing left but the cold hard truth staring them down.

Popcorn time.
Click to expand...

Lovely how the retarded right claims it opposes religion from taking the hold of government when they oppose Islam yet cheer when religious nuts reach positions of power.
 
Rod1 said:
Lovely how the retarded right claims it opposes religion from taking the hold of government when they oppose Islam yet cheer when religious nuts reach positions of power.
Click to expand...
Yes sir, it does blow one's mind. I honestly don't get it.

Praying for a Caliphate next gen? Not on my watch...
 
Rod1 said:
But isnt that what Hobby Lobby ruling did? Hobby Lobby does plays by another set of rules when it can provides its employees access to healthcare as per the law but without having to pay for contraception.

It basically amounts to a subsidy.
Click to expand...
A subsidy?! Prolly look up what that word means. Also look up the word "access". Nobody was denied access to contraception,

You owe me $50 right now, pay up. OK OK, I'll let the $50 slide. You're welcome, because I basically just gave you $50. Same logic.
 
nostradumbass said:
A subsidy?! Prolly look up what that word means. Also look up the word "access". Nobody was denied access to contraception,

You owe me $50 right now, pay up. OK OK, I'll let the $50 slide. You're welcome, because I basically just gave you $50. Same logic.
Click to expand...

Well, if you were the government and you said i owe you 50 bucks then i owe you 50 bucks.
 
nostradumbass said:
So no argument, you just owe whatever they say you owe?
Click to expand...

If all branches of government agree that i owe something then i do. Hard to say no to the guys with the guns.
 
Rod1 said:
If all branches of government agree that i owe something then i do. Hard to say no to the guys with the guns.
Click to expand...
Well they have guns and prisons, so hard to just not pay it, but you can certainly disagree and don't have to view every dime they didn't take as a favor or subsidy, or something they gave to you when it was yours in the first place. It should be a "you're welcome" for what they do take, not a "thanks" for what they don't.
 
nostradumbass said:
Well they have guns and prisons, so hard to just not pay it, but you can certainly disagree and don't have to view every dime they didn't take as a favor or subsidy, or something they gave to you when it was yours in the first place. It should be a "you're welcome" for what they do take, not a "thanks" for what they don't.
Click to expand...

If you run a red light and get fined, but government decides to slash your penalty in half isnt that subsidy?
 
Rod1 said:
If you run a red light and get fined, but government decides to slash your penalty in half isnt that subsidy?
Click to expand...
I consider a subsidy money that wasn't yours in the first place. I changed my business to mostly cash to only pay the IRS $20,000/year. Certainly not going to praise the gov't for not knowing about the rest.
 
nostradumbass said:
I consider a subsidy money that wasn't yours in the first place. I changed my business to mostly cash to only pay the IRS $20,000/year. Certainly not going to praise the gov't for not knowing about the rest.
Click to expand...

But there is a mandate to give employees access to healthcare, and these benefits which the government is giving your employees give you an advantage over your competitors.
 
He will be confirmed and everybody knows it.
It's just virtue signaling for their supporters.
After what Republicans did, they have to pretend to put up a fight.
 
Rod1 said:
But there is a mandate to give employees access to healthcare, and these benefits which the government is giving your employees give you an advantage over your competitors.
Click to expand...
They all have access to healthcare, we're talking about who pays for it. The gov't is telling you what to pay for, not giving anything. Why the hell is your employer paying for sexual recklessness? They're increasing business expenses on top of the nearly half they already take in taxes. Who can afford to start a business like this? Go to DC sometime, and check out how nice and wealthy the place is despite having pretty much 0 businesses based there. It's all confiscated money.
 
nostradumbass said:
They all have access to healthcare, we're talking about who pays for it. The gov't is telling you what to pay for, not giving anything. Why the hell is your employer paying for sexual recklessness? They're increasing business expenses on top of the nearly half they already take in taxes. Who can afford to start a business like this? Go to DC sometime, and check out how nice and wealthy the place is despite having pretty much 0 businesses based there. It's all confiscated money.
Click to expand...

Healthcare is deductible.
 
Rod1 said:
Where in the Constitution does it says that corporations are people?
Click to expand...

It doesn't say Unions are people either.

But Corporations are limited in the political campaign contributions, and Unions aren't.

Explain that one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,074
Messages
55,465,846
Members
174,785
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top