- Joined
- Sep 23, 2010
- Messages
- 8,526
- Reaction score
- 12,502
Is that like if, say, someone’s precision was really precise?The guy is actually pretty awesome at wrestling as evidenced by .....his wrestling
Is that like if, say, someone’s precision was really precise?The guy is actually pretty awesome at wrestling as evidenced by .....his wrestling
The first loss was before he went pro, the second was a year later.They were WMMAA tournaments which are amateur bouts. Ankalaev actually lost on the same card as Shavkat.Both fights were considered amateur bouts, even tho Shavkat had already gone pro, a bit strange indeed.
Yep. Here are the credentials of 2 of the best MMA wrestlers everWho cares? It's like when I bring up that Shavkat lost twice to the same guy in MMA (much more relevant than amateur wrestling), one of them after he had numerous pro fights and still gets touted as an undefeated fighter
His amateur wrestling record doesn't guarantee anything in MMA. Same goes for Bo
Rickson lost a sambo match to Ron Tripp. I wonder if Ron's son beat Khamzat?So his wrestling record is 400-1?
That’s a lot more Rickson like than No Nickles type.
Nikals hasn’t ever been remotely close to being even the best wrestler in his own college let alone the world
The only solution would have been putting Rickson, Dux, or labelle and all those other hype machines from the 80s into a tourney.Rickson lost a sambo match to Ron Tripp. I wonder if Ron's son beat Khamzat?
Frank Dux self-proclaimed record was 339-0 but I bet he didn't do many wrestling, judo or sambo tournaments. Gene Labell probably would've beaten him back in 1978 or something.
Yes because losing to whittaker would mean he's a canWho cares about this? We'll see how fraudulent Khamzat is or is he legit against Whittaker. Perfect fight for him to be exposed or proven to be the real deal.
Whittaker by KO.
What do you mean, two division champion Gregor Gilespie is just around the corner.Wrestling is wrestling.
MMA is MMA.
Been well documented being stud in one doesn't always translate into being stud in the other. Surely, does help though.
His real surname is Girikhanov. This is is common knowledge. As for the slightly different spelling between "Kazmat" (which sounds alot cooler) and Khamzat . Could be a Swedish thingKhamzat Chimaev wrestled freestyle
1. This guy's first name is not "Khamzat"
2. This guy's last name is not "Chimaev"
3. This is Greco-Roman
4. It doesn't even look like him
This fucking trash goes to page 5 but when I make a thread posting proof of UFC corruption it is deleted instantly. Fuck this place.
For everyone who has seen him compete, I don’t think the thing is about his wrestling skills or lack of them, or if he was good GR or FS, or what level wrestling was at that time in Sweden in those disciplines or if he was national team level or whatever people here are trying to argue. It’s more that he already lacked sportsmanship at that age, was a very sore loser and a dirty player and that seems to not have changed at all.Khamzat is a damn baby in these videos. Pretty funny how deep the haters have to dig to find some ammunition. To be honest I dgaf if he was outwrestled by a high school girl because he's evolved leaps and bounds.
Have you not seen his wrestling record? And Usman is not 20lbs smaller, he’s massive and walks around at over 200lbs. How come he has “bad knees” yet wrestle fucks everyone else besides khamzat…He's faced one wrestler his entire life, a 36 yr old dude 20lbs smaller with no knees
He’s still one of the best wrestlers in the world, and in mmaIt matters because people talk about him like he would've been an Olympic level wrestler if not for his visa issues. Take a hike
He already proved he’s legit. Doesn’t mean he’ll winWho cares about this? We'll see how fraudulent Khamzat is or is he legit against Whittaker. Perfect fight for him to be exposed or proven to be the real deal.