just rewatched jan vs izzy, rogan should be fired

dude was riding izzy's cock like a maniac
the-incredibles-the-incredibles2.gif
 
It's likely their job now, and he wasn't doing it purely due to his own bias.

See recent Gastelum fight, it was really damn close, they were exchanging blow for blow and you can argue Curtis edged it out.

But they were hyping it up as great return of Kelvin, or whatever, anyway.



So firing is..... not bloody likely.
 
That's how they commentate every Izzy fight. It always sounds like they're watching Griffen vs Silva.

Izzy feints > Opponents landed strikes.

If you listened to commentary alone you'd think Whittaker (2), Jan and Pereira (1) didn't land a single strike.
 
You're rehashing something that was talked about ad nauseum at the time.

What was sad was that Jan was afraid to go after Rogan, so he attacked DC instead.

DC deserves criticism, but when he works with Rogan, he usually just follows Joe's lead and does a bunch of overexaggerated reactions to KOs because they always show those videos now.

Rogan adds nothing to UFC broadcasts besides being a face that normies recognize.
 
dude was riding izzy's cock like a maniac, talking about izzy's feints like they were doing anything and ignoring jans output


cormier and anik are trash too, but rogan.. Christ almighty
You should see Bisping commentate for British fighters. <45>
 
Suggesting Dana's son should be fired?
<{danawhoah}>

Rogan's shocked expression, maybe he realizes he has no job security.

<30>
 
You're rehashing something that was talked about ad nauseum at the time.

What was sad was that Jan was afraid to go after Rogan, so he attacked DC instead.

DC deserves criticism, but when he works with Rogan, he usually just follows Joe's lead and does a bunch of overexaggerated reactions to KOs because they always show those videos now.

Rogan adds nothing to UFC broadcasts besides being a face that normies recognize.
I recall DC trying to be pretty fair in the Jan fight and giving him credit.
DC overalll gets a bit too much crap IMO.

When compared to Rogan or Bisping, he's not nearly as bias as those two can be.
 
What was sad was that Jan was afraid to go after Rogan, so he attacked DC instead..
Because DC should know better as a former fighter and champion. Rogan is a dork who hosted reality tv and game shows.
 
It's likely their job now, and he wasn't doing it purely due to his own bias.

See recent Gastelum fight, it was really damn close, they were exchanging blow for blow and you can argue Curtis edged it out.

But they were hyping it up as great return of Kelvin, or whatever, anyway.



So firing is..... not bloody likely.

So true. Yet virgins hate Curtis because he's been screwed out of a headbutt the ref missed that should have been a NC and robbed and is rightfully pissed
 
When Joe, Dana, and Buffer are all gone from the UFC, Sherbros will finally have the smoking gun that UFC is dying.
 
dude was riding izzy's cock like a maniac, talking about izzy's feints like they were doing anything and ignoring jans output


cormier and anik are trash too, but rogan.. Christ almighty

Completely agreed ..this is was the most biased commentary since Duane Ludwig vs Genki Sudo... If not WORSE.
 
Yeah you would have sworn feints were a major part of scoring criteria the way Joe was droning on about them non stop in that fight.
 
Back
Top