Jesus would have tweeted like Trump.

DickSarp said:
An agent of change? hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Right. Trump and his Wall st Billionaire cabinet are the elite.

I mean come, has he conned you into believing he's one of us?

Born a rich punk, couldn't even keep his fortune in casinos and NY realty where you'd have to be a fucking moron to lose money, offers up a massive tax cut skewed to the rich masquerading as a healthcare plan, shuts down the regulatory arm of the federal gov by appointing contrarians as department heads, and now a tax cut package that will fill the already full pockets of the economic royalists while depriving the middle and lower economic classes.

Get a grip dude.
Click to expand...

Obama's cabinet was picked by Citibank. Literally.
 
"Moses fucking prophet is it hot up here in this blazing heat. I'm trying to update you guys with my teeth since I can't use my fucking hands or feet" -therealjesuschrist00ad.
♡2,101,032.
 
2f7236bbc723df88f0c994433433030e792894d0e3e4059838de883ad6a0dbe1

main-qimg-abacedaa6c644e2de5f1c03dc5cff803-c

920x920.jpg

hqdefault.jpg
 
Neither one of these losers know a thing about Christ and His examples. Jesus' messages have lasted for thousands of years, that fool can barely make out a sentence.
 
Jesus did like to use demeaning nicknames against his opponents...

In the gospels I recall him referring to "Hare-brained Herod". And he called Caesar "Little Catapult Man".
 
Limbo Pete said:
I think you might be-



-A NEW CHALLENGER EMERGES!
Click to expand...
To be fair, Jesus was on the cross alongside a theif, so he's not exactly wrong. Thing is the theif was repentant and Jesus forgave him and promised him a "place in paradise". Trump isn't capable of either of these things.
 
44nutman said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/michele-bachmann-offers-her-thoughts-155343498.html

If there were twitter then, [Jesus] would have used it in a similar way, I think,” Brind said.

I wouldn’t restrict it to just [Trump’s] tweets. His communications in general are tactically [emulating Christ]. I don’t want to be misinterpreted to say that everything he says is equivalent to gospel. I mean, he’s on the right side, and his tactics are more reminiscent of Christ, of the tactics that Christ used when he walked the earth and which he admonished his followers to use also.

The Jesus I know would not use Twitter as a bully pulpit.

The cult of Trump has reached new levels.
Click to expand...


Unbelievable, and reveals the profound poverty of spirit (not the good kind) in much of evangelical and protestant political Christianity.

Degenerate spirituality.....
 
TSO said:
How does one narrow down the lifetime of a mythical character? I bet Hercules would have Tweeted like Sargon of Akkad(Carl, not the real Sargon)
Click to expand...


Modern scholars do not deny the existence of Jesus. He is a historical figure for certain. There is more extra biblical evidence for Jesus than there is for Caesar.
 
franklinstower said:
Modern scholars do not deny the existence of Jesus. He is a historical figure for certain. there is more extra biblical evidence for Jesus than there is for Caesar.
Click to expand...
No, that isn't at all true. There's zero evidence for him existing at all.
 
franklinstower said:
Unbelievable, and reveals the profound poverty of spirit (not the good kind) in much of evangelical and protestant political Christianity.

Degenerate spirituality.....
Click to expand...
Christianity was twisted used by the state as a political tool since the days of the Roman Empire. This is nothing new, sadly.
 
TSO said:
No, that isn't at all true. There's zero evidence for him existing at all.
Click to expand...


I am sorry but you are flatly incorrect and secular (non religious) scholars are in agreement. It is true in the late 19th century that scholars began to doubt the existence of Jesus but that ship has sailed totally.

Google search will clear this up easily.
 
franklinstower said:
I am sorry but you are flatly incorrect and secular (non religious) scholars are in agreement. It is true in the late 19th century that scholars began to doubt the existence of Jesus but that ship has sailed totally.

Google search will clear this up easily.
Click to expand...
No, you are wrong.
 
DangDaGawd said:
Source?
Click to expand...


I posted one above. This is common knowledge now. Really. There is more information about the Jesus of History than Cesar.

Dawkins was wounded in a debate when he made a similar false claim about Jesus not being historical. He recanted and no longer makes such claims.



Edit-- I was unable to defend this post about Cesar and Jesus. It IS true that modern historians accept the existence of Jesus. There is consensus on this. I was unable to defend my point about evidence of Jesus exceeding Cesar without including gospel references. I think it IS ok to use gospel references to make this point even if they have to be stripped of their supernatural elements bit that is not the point I made. I said extra biblical and that was wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,115
Messages
55,468,195
Members
174,786
Latest member
plasterby

Share this page

Back
Top