Is there anything worse than partisan political pundits?

[sub_thug]

Wtf are you talking about?

CNN had some Trump guys defending all the stupid shit he said, when he was running for president .

Trump pundits always had an excuse and did a great job of diminishing damage.

Add in that CNN covered trump 24/7.....they even cut in to live feeds just to show fucking trump.


So no...CNN actually let Trump pundits have way too much screen time and CNN is a big reason why trump became popular.


I know CNN thinks they were beimg fair by letting trump pundits in...but holy ahit, Im tired of the bias pundits arguing and creating excuses....People sont kearn anything and leave confuse.


We need news that just reports the news.....not political pundits from eachside overanalyzing some thing for the whole day, creating excuses.

They had his people on there, giving them coverage. If your claim that his people were doing their job, providing damage control, then that's just them doing their jobs. Every news outlet talks to the candidates and their people, particularly their campaign managers. When it was CNN looking at the campaign from the outside, they portrayed it like a circus sideshow. They gave him press, but not favorable press. I guess all press really is good press, but that wasn't their intent, particularly after the primaries.

The media portrayed Hillary like she was the anointed one, the guaranteed next POTUS. As a matter of fact, they wouldn't shut up about all the polls that showed her dominating. Time Magazine was showing covers like this:

The media was anything but equal in their treatment of the candidates, and to claim otherwise is absolute horseshit.