- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
- Messages
- 5,002
- Reaction score
- 2
SO you can't explain it can you? The words inclusion and segregation are mutually exclusive. Please explain how one leads to the other. In detail.
SO you can't explain it can you? The words inclusion and segregation are mutually exclusive. Please explain how one leads to the other. In detail.
SO you can't explain it can you? The words inclusion and segregation are mutually exclusive. Please explain how one leads to the other. In detail.
You are not making any god damn sense. YOU are the one that said that one leads to the other, now fucking explain your self.
That was the point I was making.
Hence the face.
You are not making any god damn sense. YOU are the one that said that one leads to the other, now fucking explain your self.
You are not making any god damn sense. YOU are the one that said that one leads to the other, now fucking explain your self.
What I've seen out of Britain is insane. Especially stuff on the BBC.
It's not even a matter of obscuring fantasy, like having Greek and Nordic Gods and Greek and Trojan heroes played by black actors or replacing white characters in fantasy book, they now have classic British novels and characters played by black actors. Blacks playing Romans in virtually every show they are featured in now, Nancy in Oliver Twist, several in that Howards End adaptation. They are even casting black actors as Scottish Lords in this Queen of Scots movie.
Depending on what the rider says (I just provided a template, the rider can say whatever you want it to say), you could write that you only want 10% white but 50% black, 1% hispanic and so on.
Are you saying that movies about Romans should only cast people from Rome? Cause if so, I have bad news for you...
Right. That excuse. It's not too far-fetched that there would be perhaps some non-white recruits in the Roman legions, even though the evidence for this doesn't exist and it's speculation. But until late in the Empire when things fell apart, the legions were made up of men from Italy.
When you have British shows having Roman officers and leaders as black men with Latin names, it just gets absurd. One or two legionnaires perhaps or auxiliary troops, although the emphasis on them would feel out of place, but not the officers and leaders who come from equestrian and senatorial families.
Ahh f#*k it. Let holyweird make whatever movies with whom ever they want. Free market will dictate how long the crazyness stays around.
Eventually they'll get tired of not making enough money ?
But this is how it has always been. Casting calls almost always have the race of the character. "White male, mid 30s". How is writing "White" next to every character in a cast any different from saying "100% white?"
The only difference of inclusion riders is that it gives power to the actors, rather than the studios, to dictate the race of the cast. Yall are acting like prior to inclusion riders no one was making decisions about the race of the cast.
I'd actually like a rider that promotes no race unless required for accuracy. The fact that they even put out a call for a white male or any race for that matter is ignorant unless they are playing a specific part.
As I mentioned earlier, a lot of the parts in Last Jedi, all they called for were genders. The character of Rose wasn't written to be Asian. It just happened that she got the part because they liked her reading. I hope that becomes more of a trend.
melanin count doesn't magically manifest all the protests you think happened.I'm not asking for proof. I'm asking what makes you think you have any insight into how black people think or what their concerns are. Like, do you hang out with lots of black people? Did you go to an HBCU? Do you spend a lot of time on Black Twitter?