hits to the back of the head....

[Deleted member 391673]

i was watching some youtubes compilation of slam knockouts and noticed that a lot of the slams seem to cause to KO because the opponent hits the back of his head on impact.

i know spiking on the neck is illegal and so is intentionally targeting the back of the head, but why is a move - particularly a forward slam (i don't know technical term for it) - not considered illegal when it seems obvious that the back of the head is a major target.

i'm not suggesting making slams illegal, just curious why it's not....

 

[Reach4theSky]

Cause slams are awesome..

 

[Deleted member 391673]

they are. i'm not disputing that

 

[g*r*b]

I guess the judges think like that fighter who said something like "I just throw 'em, where they land is their business."