Except that ones that the athletic commissions use.
This just shows that neither of you understands the unified rules. Not saying I agree with the criteria...Laying on top of a guy while he attacks you doesnt show aggression or effective grappling imo
Knight should've won and the 30-27 guy was right.
Except that ones that the athletic commissions use.
Laying on top of a guy while he attacks you doesnt show aggression or effective grappling imo
Knight should've won and the 30-27 guy was right.
And? For the vast majority of fights, the criteria works fine.These are the same commissions that gave us Bisping beating Hamill and Pearson/Sanchez.
I don't know wtf Knight was doing there. Had Amirkhani rocked twice then decided to lay on his back the entire fight not landing a single significant strike or having any real submission attempt in rounds 2 and 3. Guess he just wanted to lose. Also wtf was the 30-27, Knight did literally nothing in rounds 2 and 3.
And? For the vast majority of fights, the criteria works fine.
Although if you are arguing they should change the scoring system, I'd agree with you.
So is providing two examples saying a system is broke or flawed.Vast majority is stretching it.