Haidt's take on Charlottesville

jeffk

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
408
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...nt-commits-sacrilege/537519/#article-comments

Haidt's main idea on most topics is that you look for what people find sacred and you will find a circle of irrationality around it. In this case Trump broke a sacred taboo and is guilty of blasphemy. Now he is tainted and untouchable.

______________________________
A summary from key exerts:

The psychological logic of the rally was to bind white people together with shared hatred of Jews, African Americans, and others, under a banner and narrative of racial victimhood and racial purity

It was a rejection—a desecration—of the story shared by most Americans in which we are not a nation based on “blood and soil,” we are a nation of immigrants who accepted the American creed. That creed includes the idea that “all men are created equal.”

Americans know that we do not yet live up to our aspirations, but publicly accepting the premises of the nation’s founding documents is a requirement for political leadership in America. To deny those premises is blasphemy, and so white supremacism, the KKK, and neo-Nazis are by definition blasphemous.

Speaking spontaneously, in response to questions from reporters, he returned to his “many sides” formulation and the moral equivalency of the marchers and counter-demonstrators. The president of the United States said that there were “very fine people” on both sides.

In that moment, the president rendered himself untouchable by all who share the belief that Nazis and the KKK are not just bad—they are taboo.

This is why, for many Americans, things feel so unsettled this week. Extraordinary sacrilege has occurred, but divine retribution has not yet come down from the heavens, and we have no priest and no scripture to guide us. The world is out of balance, and America can’t just go on as before.
 
Last edited:
Cool another Charleston thread. Maybe @Madmick will delete it or merge this thread with the threads already created. He's gotten exceptional at that this week. Soon he'll merge every thread in the War room to one completed thread.
 
I have some issues with the article. I don't think most Americans treat the Declaration of Independence and US Constitution as sacred. The US Constitution is built to be modified or changed. They are set up a guides and aspirations constructed by men and set to be modified by men.

Another issue is I don't think the demonstration was really about the statue. The flyers I saw that promoted it didn't even mention the statue.
 
Haidt does make a good point about Trump potentially having a long lasting effect if Republicans don't distance themselves from the tainted Trump.
_____________________________
Republicans should know that people’s political orientations are shaped for life by events that happen when they are young, particularly between the ages of 14 and 24. The young generation—iGen, as Jean Twenge calls them—is extraordinarily progressive and passionate about matters of race and prejudice. If Republicans stand by their tainted president rather than renouncing him, an entire generation of voters may come to see the GOP as eternally untouchable.
 
The idea that removing a statue will erase history these days is comical.
ffs you can't even get away with erasing a tweet.
 
Back
Top