Felipe Arantes vs Andre Fili Unusual Scorecard

EndlessCritic

Titanium Belt
@Titanium
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
35,800
Reaction score
27,323
http://mmadecisions.com/decision/5626/Andre-Fili-vs-Felipe-Arantes

Felipe Arantes vs Andre Fili went down as a unanimous decision for Fili in 2014, 29-28 across the board.

Unusually however, all 3 judges scored the fight differently. One judge gave round 1 to Arantes. Another gave round 2 to Arantes. And the other gave round 3 to Arantes.

Are there any other examples of a scorecard like this?
 
http://mmadecisions.com/decision/5626/Andre-Fili-vs-Felipe-Arantes

Felipe Arantes vs Andre Fili went down as a unanimous decision for Fili in 2014, 29-28 across the board.

Unusually however, all 3 judges scored the fight differently. One judge gave round 1 to Arantes. Another gave round 2 to Arantes. And the other gave round 3 to Arantes.

Are there any other examples of a scorecard like this?

IIRC, they scrambled a lot trading top position. Seeing how most judges aren’t even paying attention to the fight and only look up from time to time, it makes sense doesn’t it?
 
When a split has one guy winning every round on one card but losing every round on another. Too bad there's absolutely no oversight when it comes to this stuff.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,036
Messages
55,462,909
Members
174,786
Latest member
JoyceOuthw
Back
Top