- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 53,765
- Reaction score
- 29,524
Both Cohen and Daniels are convicted liars.
lol
What lies has Daniels been convicted for?
Both Cohen and Daniels are convicted liars.
lol
What lies has Daniels been convicted for?
Someone google to see if she has banged Ron Jeremy on film, because I aint looking up that shit.
Now that Sleepy and Gassy Donny can go to Barron's graduation, what do you think Vegas sets the odds at Trump no showing.
I put it at -225 that Trump no shows. Since Vegas always wins, +175 if he does show.
lol...he's never attended any of his childrens graduation ceremonies before. i doubt he will for this one either. he'll have his excuses loaded while he goes golfing or campaigning.
To the surprise of literally nobody on the entire Earth
Election interference... it's hilarious that you even typed those words.
The claim was that Trump used Campaign Funds to pay off Stormy. We just learned that he paid through his personal funds. There is no case here... why is this judge letting this farce continue?
I thought there was only 1 for all the trials
You can bump the Trump’s home raided thread. Been posting about these unsealings and motions. People joked it was a nothing burger, yet now the trial is delayed and all the motions will have hearings. Funny that is, in’it?
Hmm, what was the evidence? Did you see it or just read about it?It’s happening now,
Defense decided to put some kind of evidence up on the screen that the Judge was pretty upset about being shown.
The Judge stood up from his chair and told them to “take it down!”..
Defense is going swell
I'd heard on public radio maybe around 2 weeks ago that there would be a chance Ms Daniels would need to prove the affair took place for some reason during her testimony, but haven't heard anything about that aspect since then. Did anyone else hear that (I believe it was Maura Liason (sp) on All Things Considered)?
Hmm, what was the evidence? Did you see it or just read about it?
I'd heard on public radio maybe around 2 weeks ago that there would be a chance Ms Daniels would need to prove the affair took place for some reason during her testimony, but haven't heard anything about that aspect since then. Did anyone else hear that (I believe it was Maura Liason (sp) on All Things Considered)?
Ah, I see she told Anderson Cooper it was a "lie" and signed falsely under duressHmm, what was the evidence? Did you see it or just read about it?
I'd heard on public radio maybe around 2 weeks ago that there would be a chance Ms Daniels would need to prove the affair took place for some reason during her testimony, but haven't heard anything about that aspect since then. Did anyone else hear that (I believe it was Maura Liason (sp) on All Things Considered)?
I hadn't come across these signed statements from her saying it didn't happen and am pretty shocked at the lack of coverage of this reality by NPR affiliates and conservative talk radio and network news radio.
If we take her at her word here that the sex did not happen then it seems clear the NDA was something done to shut her up about the fake story of them copulating, but I really don't know what she purported in court today (as to whether or not it happened) and how that does/doesn't jive with these signed statements. I also don't know the provenance of these signed statements.
Is she claiming both that she did and did not eff Trump? Any clarity offered would be very much appreciated
little baby boo hoo was having a toddler tantrum during the trial today. right when stormy testified about spanking his ass with a magazine.
I stand with the 6th, too. Why aren’t there cameras in court room? (It’s not about protecting jurors) why can’t anything be said about the judges daughter being a democrat operative? Etc…
Not a godamn thing about gag orders. The fuckery all hinges on one word, “impartial”. The judge has made previous statements in speeches about the judicial latitude to steer evidence and use estoppel to influence a trial.
It should be a legal free for all in the public square. Trust the jury to sort it out..
You're saying this trial is evidence of a double standard, when clearly it is not. You didn't blink when I said this is part of 4,000 trials he's faced in his career. We they all evidence of a double standard? You didn't blink when I mentioned his theft of millions from a charity for children with cancer.
I'm not seeing him called a white supremacist. I'm seeing people point out he's friendly with them, which is undeniable. He and his family have a history of racist property policies going back decades. I don't think he's a white supremacist or even likes them, I think he's an opportunist who only cares if they're good for his political career. I don't think he's racist, I think he's a capitalist who decided black people were bad for his properties. OK, maybe racist, but not a white supremacist. He doesn't think that big, or about anyone not him.
How do you not know about Georgia?
Here are excerpts from the call:
Here's the full unedited call so you can pick through it and tell me the excerpts are out of context: