- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 1,421
- Reaction score
- 48
Something I've noticed amongst the mma community is how many lenses past fights are inspected under. It's rare fights are left to appreciate without being criticized over time for the prime the fighters were in, the condition in which they fought each other, the method in which they won and how many rounds it took. Other things that are used to pick apart the quality of a performance I'll see are what organization it was in, the weight class of the fighters, the gym the fighters were training at, and so many other outlying factors.
What are some past wins by any fighter that don't have any holes in them? What do you go by to determine the quality of a past win?
What are some past wins by any fighter that don't have any holes in them? What do you go by to determine the quality of a past win?