Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by wilKO, Apr 16, 2018.
It was my UFC slam of the week!
It's not even particularly subtle. UFC records misses out 2 Conor losses, Max was in the UFC after 4 fights but it took Conor 14 fights and 2 losses to make it.
Conor is 29 and Max is 26 so compare Conors record up to 2015 with Max now if you want a fairer comparison.
Conor is an actual GOAT period, and multi division champ. Max lost to Conor and rules over an aging division AFTER Conor and Poirier left. Lame as fuck.
At the point of career for Pettis, yes.
second fight would be worth a watch.
Conor beat the #1 guy behind aldo in under 2 rounds...who else is there to beat, after beating the #1 guy?
Cub is a very good win, but Lamas, the guy who choked Cub out, isn't ?
Strong way to debase your thread by citing many of Conor’s tko wins as ko and Holloway’s tko wins as tko
It seems like the thread was created for the sole purpose of you celebrating that you THINK Conor has a better resume than Max.
MMAth don't work.
How is that MMA math?
Lamas beat Cub. Lamas is the better fighter.
That's not MMA math, it's just plain ole MMA.
Conors ducking everyone
which funnily enough is in northern ireland which is part of the UK
Khabib didnt want none of that.
I think you are right! He is trying so hard to imply without implying it...
You make a new conor thread every day. Fuck off.
Yet you still click on them? It's really easy to avoid. It has Conor's name in the title. Why does me making Conor threads anger you so much?
I never said anything about who he did or didn't beat. For whatever reason he didn't have to fight any of the gatekeepers. Not his fault , just the way the cards fell